My Authors
Read all threads
Trump governs like an outsider, saying what he thinks, letting it rip. He’s made it work for him.

But there is a downside. When the WH comments on a matter traditionally left to the Justice Dept., it makes the matter political instead of judicial.

Justice must be blind.
In the case of Stone’s sentence, Justice says they overruled the long sentence recommended by Mueller’s team prior to Trump’s tweet. I accept and believe that. But Trump/Barr opponents don’t believe it. Which is why it’s best if the WH does not comment on specific criminal cases.
On CNN this morning, legal correspondent, Jeffrey Toobin, said the sentence was excessive. Anchors Alisyn Camerota and Jim Sciutto said it was in line with standard sentences. Which is it? It would be nice if someone neutral, neither pro- nor anti-Trump, would report the facts.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Ari Fleischer

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!