***Why LDL and ApoB Shouldn't be used Interchangeably!***
I think there's a very serious problem resulting from confusion on these two markers that may appear to be exactly the same, but aren't.
Knowing the difference can explain quite a lot...
*(Technically, some hepatic ApoB lipoproteins can start out as LDL, but we'll save that for another time)
Note I qualified "in a healthy metabolism"
What happens in an *un*healthy metabolism -- particularly one where someone is, say, hyperinsulinemic T2D?
Do we see only a tiny fraction of their ApoB as VLDL? Often we don't
Simply stated, I posit this is high level energy delivery failure, and that's generally very bad.
ApoB lumps in both remnants and LDL.
Given remnants have a massive association by itself without LDL -- using ApoB manages to attach LDL to the outcomes anyway so it's sure to get the blame.
And of course, this is very relevant to low carbers given they often have very high ApoB, yet very low triglycerides.
Remnants have a high association with ASCVD and all cause mortality.
ApoB lumps remnants and LDL together, thus creating the impression LDL has this high risk association where likely far more remnant-related.
Solution: don't use ApoB and LDL interchangeably