Here’s why Boris Johnson’s “cunning plan” could be so dangerous – and why the reassuring things that British politicians are telling the public are likely wrong.
[Thread.]
“A gigantic fish is eating all your constituents and [the mayor from Jaws] decides to keep the beach open. It turns out he was wrong. But it remains that he was heroically right in principle.”
Now, Boris is staking British lives on that principle.
The UK thinks it can space out infections without taking radical measures. But because corona manifests slowly yet grows exponentially, that strategy hasn't worked anywhere else.
And once it's obvious things are getting out of hand, it's probably too late.
Don’t believe it?
Look at this comparison with Germany.
(Analysis inspired by @henrikenderlein.)
Like the UK, many countries at first trusted their medical system to be capable of meeting the onslaught of demand for critical care.
But though the NHS is amazing at many things, it has simply never had to deal with a comparable challenge.
On one model, enacting social distancing one day later increases the number of infections by 40%.
The time to act is now.
Why is the government keeping schools and offices open?
Apparently, it wants to ensure that a lot of younger people get sick first, making older people safe once Britain reaches herd immunity.
Will old people really go months without seeing their grandkids…
…or their children who are in daily touch with those grandkids…
…especially when the government is telling people not to panic?
Unlikely.
This is obviously true of the sick and immunocompromised. But every day, corona also brings more healthy, young people to Italian ICUs.
If the NHS crumbles, the young could die at non-negligible rates.
“They gasp if they walk a bit more quickly,” one expert said.
businessinsider.com/coronavirus-re…
Let’s take some comparatively optimistic estimates made by experts:
UK Population: 66 million
Infection rate: 60%
Fatality rate: 1%
Deaths due to corona: 396,000.
Let that sink in.
And then bear two further things in mind:
• The fatality rate could turn out to be much higher…
• …especially if the NHS gets overwhelmed.
Perhaps. But playing for time can still make a massive difference:
• It reduces the risk of overburdening the NHS
• It buys time for scientists to develop a vaccine or antiviral drugs
The assumption behind the government’s cunning plan is that people who recover from corona will be immune.
But will they be?
Hopefully so. But the experts just don’t know for sure.
Who’s right? 🤷♂️.
And yet, the British government is gambling with lives on the assumption that its bet will turn out right.
independent.co.uk/life-style/hea…
A lot of the press and some of my friends have been saying: But Boris Johnson is following expert advice!
Well, he’s following the advice of *a few* experts. But as any non-expert can see, that advice is clashing with the advice of A LOT of other experts.
“The idea that countries should shift from containment to mitigation is wrong and dangerous.”
As was Roy Anderson, a Professor of Epidemiology at Imperial College.
I mean, the consensus on this is so strong that even Donald Trump is starting to follow it!
I dearly hope we are all wrong about what we'll be facing very soon.
But it's time for the British public to think for themselves, not to blithely entrust their lives in Boris Johnson's cunning plan.
[End]
Is that true? I've no idea.
But these kinds of discoveries are a key reason why slowing corona's spread could save many lives.
journals.lww.com/jhypertension/…
"Your house is on fire. The people whom you have trusted with your care ... have inexplicably chosen to encourage the flames in the misguided notion that somehow they will be able to control them."
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…