They distributed food—free—to the people in the locked down streets. Everybody calmed down.
I think it shows a case of advanced human knowing.
It shows an understanding of people's concerns, and an understanding that it is these concerns that require the response — that the concerns need to be responded to precisely as they are.
This was what people needed. To know that there will be provisions.
They could stop the multiply dangerous behaviour of overrunning supermarkets.
They could stop endangering themselves and each other.
Which worry do such approaches assuage? None. Instead, they instill fear and further worry. This creates only new layers of very legitimate concerns! Dangerous concerns, divisive concerns.
To see what matters. To see that concern and care show clearly what is needed.
The lines between care and concern are direct. We (often) don't need complicated responses, stark measures.
Instill trust.
We depend on each other. Apart from needing sustenance and shelter, we need to know how to go on with each other.
#COVID-19
#COVID-19
I got it from Ezequiel, for those of you who know who I'm talking about :).
Ontological intimacy:
researchgate.net/publication/32…
Enactive care and life:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
elenaclarecuffari.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/cuffar…
Loving and knowing:
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
mitpress.mit.edu/books/linguist…