The idea that the CIA's T-50 program with the #FSA "failed" & the DOD's Train, Advise, Assist & Equip program with the #YPG-#SDF "succeeded" -- one key point made here -- is a bit of a simplification.
There can't be a direct comparison, given the operational differences.
The CIA's T50 program was covert & limited strictly to weapons supply & [very] limited intel support/external advice to groups (a) active in a highly complex environment, amid hostile jihadists & (b) against governments, with airforce/s, artillery etc.
The DOD's #YPG-#SDF program was initiated amid a direct U.S military intervention, in which U.S. SOF were deployed on the ground & close air support & later artillery support was provided -- to strengthen the #SDF, incentivize its unity, and protect it from *all* rivals/enemies.
In response to the CIA's T50 program, large swathes of the #FSA coalesced & posed a far enhanced force on the battlefield -- but in doing so, they were confronted by #Syria's air force & then #Russia's.
Given complexity on the ground, resulting dynamics were far from a surprise.
As a result of the DOD's direct military intervention & partnership with the #YPG-#SDF, the group was provided with the space to unite, grow in professionalism & establish on-ground realities (military, governance etc.) that were de facto protected by a U.S. air & ground shield.
The #FSA was empowered enough to matter, but not enough to outcompete AQ or defend itself against an overwhelming #Syria-#Russia assault.
Let's not forget, the #SDF's "success" catalyzed multiple #Turkey military interventions & a bitter Kurd-Arab conflict that'll last decades.
The idea that #Turkey would turn hostile to an empowered #YPG was a basic fact in 2014 -- but we chose to go down that path & create the deep & likely irreversible socio-political consequences for northern #Syria.
That's on us -- labeling that a "success" would be hubris.
In Aug '14, military expediency & few options played a role, as did deep skepticism of #Turkey & its capacity to provide an #FSA alternative -- all true.
But the self-identified DOD "architect" of the then T&E mission told me at the time that Kurds were a kind of Arab, so...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"I absolutely reject that somehow, what's about to happen to women because of the #Taliban taking over the government is simply something we have to tolerate as the prince of doing business in South & Central Asia."
@BrookingsInst@MiddleEastInst "Where this really began to unravel was then when U.S. chose to make a separate deal with the #Taliban, to exclude the #Afghan govt & to set a certain date for when we'd depart... only then did we begin to see the real problem unfold."
@BrookingsInst@MiddleEastInst "When we departed, there was a very real signal: 'you are on your own'... The advisors left... When we pulled out, we took out about 18,000 contractors... the way we equipped them, they relied wholly on those contractors."
#Biden's decision to stick to the Aug 31 deadline is bold -- it raises 2 key risks:
1) We'll be leaving people behind, certainly 1,000s of #Afghans & quite likely, a few Americans in hard-to-reach spots.
2) Other G7/NATO states have been rebuffed again by #Biden -- more anger.
"#Biden's decision to pull out troops was backed by most Americans, 53%-38%. But almost two-thirds, 62%, disapproved of the way his administration has handled that withdrawal."
Note to all -- it *is* possible for both these things to be true:
1) The #Afghanistan withdrawal has been a debacle, due to a lack of planning; hurried schedule; & ignoring worst-case scenarios.
2) The USG & NATO evacuation effort in recent days has been extraordinary & heroic.
Similarly, while it's entirely legitimate to argue that staying in #Afghanistan for 20yrs was illustrative of mission creep and strategic errors, that doesn't in any way mean that a withdrawal was guaranteed to result in chaos, humanitarian crisis & a terrorist state.
If a public figure is telling you that policy 'failure' in #Afghanistan made chaos inevitable -- he/she is lying to you.
If a public figure tells you that the heroic [crisis] evacuation effort is evidence that everything's fine -- he/she is also lying to you.
There's lots of first-hand accounts of this from recent days -- intensifying over time. For now, the window's closing/closed for #Afghans, as the U.S. & others prioritize their citizens' evacuation.
This was all inevitable given the tight timeline, and it'll worsen too.
More than any other aspect of the #Afghanistan withdrawal, this is what should have been 100% avoidable.
And as @RepAdamSchiff has just stated, the IC *did* warn of a swift #Taliban victory -- this was *not* an intelligence failure, it was a political/decision-making one.
@RepAdamSchiff The #Taliban aren't stupid; they know the U.S. (& #NATO allies) are under pressure -- #Taliban fighters have significantly increased their intimidation of Afghans outside #HKIA - countless reports of beating, whipping & even gunfire.
Smoke & mirrors -- #Biden is clearly determined to defend the policy of withdrawal, but that's not the core reason for today's anger.
The debacle was *how* that withdrawal was conducted. It's just not enough to shoulder-off the blame to #Afghanistan.
"The #Taliban doesn't even have an airforce," #Biden says.
- Well, they certainly do now, Mr President.
If I'm not mistaken, #Biden hasn't yet mentioned the appalling suffering, panic & terror being felt by so many across #Afghanistan -- it's all about defending the withdrawal & blaming the disaster on #Afghans.
Just a bafflingly tone deaf message, considering global attention.