Well, actually, you’ve been listening to Fox News again Uncle Tucker. We know the culture war is a (ahem) #Trump-ed up debate designed specifically to whip you into a factless frenzy and hate schools and #teachers
6/
“MY tax dollars should fund #students not systems!”
“Fine! I want #schoolvouchers—I mean Hope/Opportunity whatchamacallits! We need to fund students not systems!”
Well actually (and nice use of @BetsyDeVos marketing slogan), vouchers mostly just go to kids already in private schools without them
8/
“The government shut down #schools and caused my kids’ learning to drop!”
Well actually, if you’re concerned about #COVID19 impacts on #learning, #schoolvouchers, doubled pandemic and even Hurricane Katrina impacts on academics where they’ve been tried!
9/
By this time your angry #MAGA relative will be likely asleep or passed out from the Turkey and the Wild Turkey too.
But the bottom line is: No schools are perfect because humans aren’t perfect. But by and large research affirms a vigorous commitment to #publiceducation.
I always go back to @matt_barnum on this, who said we need to take seriously the alarm from school leaders even as we explore the mismatch with admin data.
It’s silly to argue that admin data show anything like a crisis on teacher exits. Those data don’t.
But I’m surprised that with advent of mixed methods in policy research more folks aren’t looking for ways to join both #educators perspectives and admin data.
2/
I suspect some of this comes down to the same old difference in the way economists study data without always interrogating sources.
3/
❌ Third, related to villains is stoked fear:
✔️ perceived threat to way of life
✔️ fear of “the other”
✔️ imagined threats to own children coupled with willingness to actually put them at risk
ExcelInEd *seems* safe because they’re moderate relative to crazy Dixon-type book ban howls today and have impressive array of moderate funders you’d expect from a Bush-led org.
And as an org in many ways they are. I’d take them over @BetsyDeVos any day.
3/
🧵🪡
It’s a big edu/policy research conference week (#APPAM2022#ASHE2022#UCEA22) and here’s a short thread on ideological diversity in edu-research and edu-journalism #edchat using the Greene/Heritage studies as a hook
1/
Some formal edu research/journo communities have tolerated increasingly far-Right stuff for years, in part because of a genuine commitment to multi-perspectives, and also out of fear of being labeled ideological or against free speech themselves
2/
And in the #edchat journalism space there is some of the notorious #bothsides pressure too, to give voices to the Heritages and Catos if the world.
This is why people like Corey DeAngelis routinely are quoted as expert researchers when they’re really political activists
Voucher “empirical” research showing positive academic effects are no less a political tactic than this piece of garbage here—and by the same organizations.