Since the recent event with arguably the largest echo was the #FOMC decision, it's called - what else- "The Pause That Refreshes" 1/n #FRB #FederalReserve
The first thing to notice is that goods prices have broadly stabilised and volumes are fairly flat - in other words, #NGDP has ceased its torrid pace of increase. Service prices are still elevated but #payroll cost increase is slowing. 2/n
The #ISM#PMI showed an uptick but is still below 50 which implies that revenue growth is NOT about to accelerate again. Again, slower #inflation & flatline volume = an end to the boom, but not yet a bust. 3/n
Now, about those #banks.
For all the undeniable stress suffered by individual institutions, deposits are still only ~5% below trend - a lesser shortfall than pre-lockdown months. Admittedly the swing from surplus to deficit has been a doozy, but it's not yet Grapes of Wrath.
4/n
Broadly, #deposits are off ~$900bln since mid-Dec: ~1/3 of that has been *borrowed* back from the market, 1/3 from the #Fed & the rest accommodated by security sales -dumping ~1/3 of the vast hoard built up over C19. Meanwhile, money-market fund assets have jumped #$600bln 5/n
Where things do potentially get icky is the DC, where the #Treasury Secretary -further sullying her reputation as an actual economist- is #Yellen an' screamin' (!) that she wants MOAR blank cheques, NOW!
'Crowding' out or renewed inflation the only altetrnatives.
6/n
Institutional investors may have been picking up the slack left by the banks, but retail certainly seems less than enthused here, with long-term fund flows essentially flat for months. 7/n
As a result, the median stock has pretty much gone nowhere for a year (and has made no lasting new ground for since late 2017). Which way will #equities move when they leave this pattern? 8/n
#Bonds, too, have stalled out as everyone who is buying mega-caps because there will *be* no hard landing is cognitively dissonant enough to believe the #Fed pause turns to cut by the late summer & rates continue on down below 3%, 2 years hence. 9/n
FYI, there's an awful lot riding on just which direction we break out of this neat little wedge formation. Look at the #COT numbers, if you will:-
6 short months ago, the #dollar was going to grind the politically hapless Brits & the suicidally #nuclear-phobic European #FX into the dust. All of a sudden, #Russia & #China are going to persuade everyone to eschew its use (face palm).
Upshot? Mean reversion. 11/n
As @steve_sedgwick & I discussed, no #oil analyst in the world seems to accept that the damn stuff is getting cheaper, not the converse (look at #TTF#natgas, too: 1/10 of last year's panic highs).
If anything, this looks like $60/bbl, however hard to credit. 12/n
But if the #energy crowd sounds more like a bunch of frustrated #gold bugs, *that* actual crew had their cheers die once more in their throats as the Pet Rock again bashed its head on $2075/oz.
A bit more banking angst & another #USD slide needed to get it out & up to $2400. 13/n
Were I the self-publicising type (viz., distaff-side economists "COUGH!"), my *Cantillon Consulting Rule* would be: Everytime NAPM/#ISM less the 50 break-even loses a cumulative 20+ points in a year, we get a recession. Only false reading in 70 yrs, the '96 auto strike.
#PMI
Yet, even as the sector languishes, as per the #PMI, #manufacturing #construction contines to set new records.
And, this time, we can't even blame super low interest rates or the kind of laxity in providing funding to whcih we've become accustomed of late.
🤔
For illustration, #manufacturing #construction spending versus revenues (shipments).
The point YOU miss is that the US govt (Fed+ State/Local) commandeers $10 trillions' worth of scarce resources each year (BEA Govt GFS), more than HALF of Private Net National Product (BEA 1.7.5 & 1.1.5).
The deficit amounts to $1.8tln pa; 2 1/2 x net private biz investment. 1/x
Of course, to you Double-#MMT Heads, the State's voracity, waste & corruption are doing a vast service to the poor souls whose "savings" are thereby eaten up & whose income & capital formation, both, are diverted to cost-plus mandates, subsidies, nest-feathering & boondoggles 2/x
And how do you justify this utter perversion of economic sense? By pointing to the static accounting tautology that what Leviathan scoffs & issues IOUs against is an equal & opposite boon to the Granny who gets to stack them in place of food in her now emptied cupboard! 3/x #MMT
If there is ONE lesson to be drawn from the past two years of conflict reporting in both the #Ukraine & now #Gaza it is that, even with countless mobile device cameras at hand, it is still impossible to penetrate the lies, deception & propaganda to reach the verity of what-
-is actually taking place; of who is doing what to whom and why. The old, Napoleonic simile, "to lie like a bulletin", still holds true - "citizen journalists", or no.
If there is a second lesson, it is that this proves no impediment to the generation of MSM red-top rage or-
-to the unthinking, onward propagation of fabrications, misinterpretations & rushed judgements by the credulous, the prejudiced & the sensation junkies, here on social media.
A third lesson, perhaps, is that this sad reality extends to all of what we think of as "history"-
A disparate cluster of interests -some venal, some ideological, some quasi-religious- have found common expression in the issue of #Climate™️. Too much, intellectually, financially, emotionally, politically has been sunk into it to allow for honest discussion. 1/x
Even minor scepticism or attempts at technical or economic discussion start by begging the question of whether ANY of this game is worth the candle; all include the Insh’allah of “...while climate change is accelerated and we must (!) address the problem at once...”
2/x
If we start from the false premise that the threat is both pressing and existential, then obviously we narrow the choice to a menu of ‘solutions’ which involve vast expenditure, radical social upheaval, and severe limitations on personal liberty.
3/x
Smith, for all his virtues, here begs the question of what determines prices. If it were always simply at the whim of the producer why would such individuals and firms limit themselves to (1.05)^n? Why not 1.1? 1.2? 2? 200? 2000?
...would each not strive to acquire all those identifiably up- and downstream of it, collapsing the very division of labour Smith so correctly lauded?
And what of the VALUE of these so easily dictated profits? If the final price rises exponentially, the entrepreneur’s return...
...turns to dust in his hands: his 5% surplus buys only 1/(1.05)^[n-1] finished goods in the worst case, so who benefits? And where does the money come from to pay such a pyramid of rising purchase and sale prices if not from the REAL #inflation determinant - expanding credit!?
Now, children, ask yourselves what the Treasury will do with that $1.4tln.
(Hint: it will not be locked in a vault in Iron Mountain)
Next, ask what the successive orders of recipients of that $1.4tln will do with their booty.
(Hint 2: no mattresses will be stuffed) ....
So, class, you can see that -to the extent the banks do *not* create extra credit to accommodate the USTs- we will DIVERT ‘liquidity’, not destroy it - and some of the very same Co.s you’re buying today will see revenues increase even as others’ will fall....
Not saying such a shift will be free of consequences -nor denying that some of those outcomes may aggravate unsuspected vulnerabilities- but prima facie doom is to be avoided...