So Mike @MichaelAvenatti, you've just proven once again, by reporting your "investigative findings" of Michael Cohen by investigating the WRONG GOD DAMN MICHAEL COHEN, that lawyers need to stay in their fucking lanes & let actual investigators do investigations. You suck goat-ass
I mean, let's just look at some ACTUAL invesitgative findings, simply performed, using public records access, specifically US Census data. There are 1397 people named Michael Cohen in the United States alone. With that big of a pool, absolute verification is common procedure.
It's important in ANY investigation that involves accessing sensitive personal data, LIKE BANKING RECORDS which @MichaelAvenatti COULD ONLY HAVE ILLEGALLY OBTAINED to make sure you're violating the RIGHT PERSON'S PRIVACY FOR THE RIGHT GOD DAMN REASONS!
You see that's one of the things that we, actual investigators, train for during our educational phase along with other procedural requirements which ensure all the evidence we obtain is LEGALLY ADMISSIBLE IN A COURT OF FUCKING LAW.
Otherwise there is NO POINT TO OUR JOBS.
Otherwise there is NO POINT TO OUR JOBS.
@MichaelAvenatti 's "investigation" is nothing more than a trainload of crack-hookers slamming right into a concrete wall at 90mph. You don't see cops coming into courtrooms, dressed in cheap suits, trying to be fucking lawyers one day because they "feel competent enough" do you?
See, @MichaelAvenatti ? I'm not the only who knows this shit and is talking about it, you incompetent boob.
Now it's time to play "Grade the Lawyer." Here;s just one page of a trial transcript that Avenetti was council for one of the parties of. Let's examine his courtroom super-competent juridical acumen, shall we? 
