One of the fundamental features of Liberalism of any kind is a belief in the idea of "Progress" - the idea that today is always better than yesterday. And tomorrow will be better than today.

But what is the problem with this idea? (Contd..)
A belief in progress also means that certain ideas are rendered obsolete.

i.e...

If you believe in progress, then you also have to believe that certain ideas or modes of behavior are superior to others.
And this implies you have to necessarily develop a contempt for people who hold on to those obsolete ideas / ways of thinking.
So to be a liberal or a progressive inevitably also implies that you must be against "diversity"-because progress runs counter to diversity of ideas/ways of living and thinking

If some ideas are indeed better, and we keep "progressing" with time, diversity can't be a good thing
So even though diversity of the more superficial kind (especially that of color or gender) tends to be championed by liberals, the more fundamental diversity of thought, speech and conduct is anathema to "liberalism" in general, because it challenges the notion of "progress".
The conflict between "progress" on one hand and "diversity" on the other is an irreconcilable conflict.

"Progress" invariably drives the homogenization of culture, morals, even language, food, attire.
If you are for "progress" then you can't simultaneously hold that all ways of living are valid or equally respectable.
Eg: The ideology of "progress" deemed a century ago that a democratic govt with one vote / person is a universal ideal

What that means is that there is no room now for anyone to hark back and argue for an alternative from the past. Eg: Franchise based on property/education qual
If you do so then you are deemed to be "against Progress" - a "conservative" or much worse a "regressive".
Conservatives wouldn't accept this charge of "regression" because they are much more comfortable with diversity than liberals, and are less wedded to the notion of continual "progress"
Eg: If you never accept in the first place that universal franchise is the ideal but merely one of the many forms of choosing one's govt, then harking back to a limited franchise doesn't necessarily imply being "regressive" but merely choosing an alternative to the present system
A more trivial example of "progress" is in the mundane matter of "attire". Again, "progress" has deemed "comfort" as the ideal that should override any aesthetic considerations
This has meant casual attire in the"liberal" west has increasingly tended towards wearing less and less during summers. As that is deemed more "comfortable". The result is that both genders excel each other in getting as close to nude on public streets during summer,where I live!
In this "progressive" climate, if you argue for a more formal public wear even during summer (for instance western wear from 1950s), that is deemed "regressive"

Because progress has deemed comfort as the ideal. And that ideal keeps pushing you towards lesser and lesser clothing
"Progress" creates homogenizing ideals everywhere. THis includes education. Where a "common curriculum" is deemed to be an ideal

It is irrelevant to the liberal ideal ofc that different students have different appetites for what can be learnt. Yet a "common syllabus" is embraced
Another example of the "progressive ideal" at work is in the domain of food and nutrition.

There is a fad of developing what is called a "balanced diet" that people are impelled to move towards. Regardless of what they may require.
Eg: In an old classical text like Manu Smriti (which is not progressive in any way), there is no silver bullet when it comes to dietetics

The food prescribed for a scholar is different from the food prescribed for a laborer. The latter needs a LOT more protein than the former.
But modern "progressive" thought holds this diversity of recommendations in contempt.

There has to be ONE balanced diet. That is supposed to work for everyone! That's the modern way.
The idea of progress is an idea that is fundamentally opposed to diversity. It emphasizes uniformity, by its very definition

This is precisely the reason why the world needs "conservatives" to take on the inexorable "march" of progress" and say "Stop" once in a while!
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Shrikanth Krishnamachary
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!