This question from David touches on the intersection of foreign policy and trade and deserves a thread 👇🏽
explaintrade.com/blogs/2018/9/8…
This means a negotiating team will at times find themselves speaking with someone whose local newspapers do not public critique.
Few authoritarian regimes are so secure they can consistently or brazenly ignore major interests groups at home.
These groups could be oligarchal, military, religious, ethnic, tribal or regional. Regardless, they rely on their ongoing support to stay in power.
Perhaps strong views. Opposing these views introduces a political cost to the authoritarian and impacts their calculus.
A key role of a diplomatic officer in any country to which they are posted is to help his government better understand the inner workings, political forces and hidden currents of the country of their accreditation.
It is they, supported by trained analysts in capital, who can shed light on the redness of lines.
There are vaguely attributed anecdotes floating around the trade world of people who sat down at a negotiating table only to see a copy of their own supposedly secret brief sitting in their opposite number's documents.
Prove me wrong, Deep State Cucks!
In this case, more depends on the negotiator reading the other delegation on the various issues. What makes them look up? When do they start scribbling notes? When do seniors come in?
Happy trading!