(1) Thread #6 about the #TaosCompound #NMCompound case, starting 9/12/18.
Catch up with Thread #5 here:
Learn the whole story by starting with Thread #1 on 8/14/18 here:
#RuleOfLaw #NewMexico #RememberAbdul
Catch up with Thread #5 here:
Learn the whole story by starting with Thread #1 on 8/14/18 here:
#RuleOfLaw #NewMexico #RememberAbdul
(2) Update as of today:
>The 5 defendants will remain in custody pre-trial in the firearms case that is in the FEDERAL jurisdiction.
>Further federal charges are possible.
>Further STATE jurisdiction charges are possible.
>Dumb things are still being said by LWNJs & RWNJs.
>The 5 defendants will remain in custody pre-trial in the firearms case that is in the FEDERAL jurisdiction.
>Further federal charges are possible.
>Further STATE jurisdiction charges are possible.
>Dumb things are still being said by LWNJs & RWNJs.
(3) Yes, there are nutjobs at the far end of both sides of the political spectrum.
I disavow bigotry against anyone that is SOLELY on the basis of their religion, race or any other "constitutionally protected class."
It's wrong AND it could ruin the prosecution case.
I disavow bigotry against anyone that is SOLELY on the basis of their religion, race or any other "constitutionally protected class."
It's wrong AND it could ruin the prosecution case.
(5) Two points:
If LEOs need to formally interview a minor about alleged crimes by their parents/guardians & there are no additional guardians available, it is acceptable to interview him or her without p/g present.
Withdrawal of medical care likely caused the child's death.
If LEOs need to formally interview a minor about alleged crimes by their parents/guardians & there are no additional guardians available, it is acceptable to interview him or her without p/g present.
Withdrawal of medical care likely caused the child's death.
(6) It's hard to see how media could have reported the religious ritual aspect of this case any differently. As I showed in earlier threads, it's well known that religious beliefs of any type have been used everywhere to justify withdrawal of child medical treatment.
(7) This child had well known, verified medical needs. The "stepmother" & "father" deliberately stopped his meds & failed to take him to a doctor after seizures lasting >5 minutes.
Reciting the Lord's Prayer or the US Constitution over him would have made zero difference.
Reciting the Lord's Prayer or the US Constitution over him would have made zero difference.
(8) Normally I'd say it was just a defense attorney's predictable claim that their religious beliefs were used against them, but in this case, the attorney is absolutely right. I cringe every time I read it being done.
Stop handing things to the defense.
Stop handing things to the defense.
