As I argue in the post, it’s plausible she’s telling the truth, that she’s lying or that is an invented memory she believes in good faith. I don’t mean these are equally plausible, simply that each are plausible. The scenario that is deeply implausible is that she ...
2/ accurately remembers a real incident but that it happened at a different point in her life and with a different assailant, despite the fact that she is certain that it is a person she knew well at the time. This is deeply implausible. And yet this is the theory ...
3/ Senate Republicans insist is the case. The only reason to believe this theory is it’s political convenience. talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/unpacki…
