Sinclair is now reportedly requiring dozens of local stations to air a segment that defends the tear-gassing of migrants and describes them as an “invasion of our country.”
I’m not sure we’ve figured out how to conceptualize this adequately.
*THREAD*
The segment smoke-screens this central fact with chaotic, frightful imagery.
Sinclair is lending air cover to this campaign and flirts with endorsing violence against asylum-seekers.
During 2016, Sinclair played a big role attacking “fake news” on Trump’s behalf.
I recount this story in my book, in a chapter on the "pro-Trump media machine":
amazon.com/Uncivil-War-De…
And under Trump, this is at a new high.
My book offers polling data confirming this:
amazon.com/Uncivil-War-De…
Majorities of overall Americans trust the news media, not Trump, to tell them the truth.
But *huge* majorities of Republicans trust Trump:
amazon.com/Uncivil-War-De…
Sinclair has broadcast similar agitprop defenses of Trump amid the child separations and after Charlottesville white supremacist violence:
mediamatters.org/blog/2018/11/2…
Sinclair and Fox News together reach a whole lot of people. It would be useful to know how many.
As @JuddLegum says:
“Trump is carrying on a conversation with his voters under the radar that we just don’t understand. Democrats are not carrying on this same kind of conversation with their voters.”
Worth thinking about.
Hope you’ll check it out. FIN
amazon.com/Uncivil-War-De…
Sinclair and Fox haven't merely pushed pro-Trump propaganda on migrants and other things.
They have *also* amplified Trumpian attacks on the *independent* press. A disinformation twofer!
From "An Uncivil War":
amazon.com/Uncivil-War-De…