“I don’t want to be a junior investor at a big firm, and then likely have to join another startup or start a company before being able to join back as a general partner, or start my own firm—I want to invest sooner”?
Some musings—feel free to add.
Note: Some firms allow “junior VCs” to write checks, or at least share credit.
Being a “junior VC” at a great firm is a great education—and launch pad: @sarahtavel discovered Pinterest at Bessemer, joined it, and then joined Benchmark as a GP.
Many people got their start this way, some of them are the best investors in the world.
So, if you can get the job (they are very hard to get), and you want to do it, go for it!
But not everybody can get the job, nor wants it.
Because being a “good investor” to *most* people is about track record.
You can say all you want about other attributes (and they’re all true!) but at the end of the day, your track record is the most legible currency.
Hence the urgency. The sooner you start, the sooner you are 7 years away from being potentially considered a "great investor" in some people's eyes.
VC is reflexive — a person is considered “great investor” because they have a big win.
This creates a fly wheel effect: Once they get that brand, more deals come their way —> more big wins. Success begets success.
It’s tautological
Of course, there are more sophisticated ways to evaluate investors. Do founders like them? Do they have good decision making process? Etc.
But these are hard to measure, and thus hard to prove.
Join a firm that, in addition to educating you, allows you to write a check, or gives you a path to writing a check, or shares credit on deals you work on. Something (!)
If you invest in a bunch of duds, you won’t prove much. On the contrary.
Investing in Uber now doesn’t demonstrate much judgment, although access is important too.
A scout is someone that a firm gives money to to invest on their behalf.
The firm puts up the money, the scout makes the investment, and the scout typically gets a small cut of the profits.
A firm might do this to extend their network, get better deal flow, test out a potential GPs, etc.
After all, Sequoia’s early scout fund had Uber, Thumbtack, Stripe.
And somewhat controversial.
Imagine working your ass off for years not writing any checks + some schlub writes a check into company they don’t understand + it becomes huge?
That’s venture sometimes.
Well.
You have some unfair advantage as it relates to deal flow.
This is a pretty rare thing to have, but if you do it it’s a strong moat.
For me it was On Deck. I was also lucky to work at Product Hunt.
Why does this matter? “Good investors” get better deal flow.
To build track record, write checks early—into good companies.
To write checks, join a firm that lets you do so, or angel/become a scout.