My idea of an ancient AI has been called "mystical." This saddens me because it's derived from Occam's Razor. What else explain ls our ancient archeology but an advanced civilization... jtrue.com/blog/kronos-be…
Of course i'm not doing myself any favors avoiding the mystical label by next discussing how "demons" and a type of Jungian mind technology... jtrue.com/blog/case-for-…
And since i am already digging myself a hole let's go ahead and drop the mic with the concept of human crops confined to a flat terrarium. jtrue.com/blog/column/is…
Yet all of these are occam's razor. It fits observational evidence with no need for special relativity, it explains the paranormal, it solves for elite alter possessions and the illuminati, and finally it justifies the ironclad treaty of Antartica. But it's too "mystical"
It explains ancient Egyptian ruins with no torch soot on the ceiling, it explains advanced mind control, early genentic crop mutations, ancestral magick, and the genetic regulators which make us die too young. But it's all too mystical until you pick up a ruler and measure.
We are veal. Image how dangerous we'd be if we lived to 300. If we had time to fully awaken and develop our psychic powers. We'd be walking super dolphins - orcas with thumbs. Unstoppable wild horses.
What's the difference between a seer and a science fiction writer? Both scry into the future using their intuition. One uses spell craft the other uses words. 
