Me : Not my thing.
X : Go on.
Me : What are you after?
X : Acquisitions.
Me : Hmmm, a bucketload of tech acquisitions around Kubernetes. Expect big juicy deals.
X : It's the future?
Me : No. Mostly cash rich past giants with no future being clueless.
Me : Some very profitable niches. Savvy tech buyer will wait until hype dries up before swooping in for tasty acquisitions around 2021-2022. This year will mainly be the clueless with big chequebooks. Hoping some friends will make it big this year.
Me : Are you sure? It has been doing a good job of it - Cloud, Big Data, Containers ... it's always the same.
X : So, where is the future?
Me : I thought you were interested in acquisitions? They are not the same.
Me : Yes, buy my friends companies. Pay way over the odds to send positive market signals.
X : Will that help?
Me : My friends? Yes. I'm sure they will be delighted.
Me : No.
X : What can the giants do?
Me : Make my friends rich.
X : I mean what can the giants do to improve their fortunes?
Me : Why do I care?
Me : You've lost me.
X : Don't you do strategy for others?
Me : No. I teach companies how to map. I don't do "strategy" for anyone ... well, bar a few good friends and bits of Gov. I'm not in that game, I like to research instead.
Me : That whole space. Kubernetes, containers and related DevOps type things are where big juicy acquisitions should be at.
X : Because companies are clueless?
Me : Yes. And also to make my friends rich.
X : Where is the future?
Me : Serverless.
Me : Companies aren't big enough yet. Why buy the future today for $50 million when you can buy the exact same thing tomorrow for $2 billion.
X : The market doesn't work like that.
Me : Oh but it does -
Me : No, it's called inertia. There are many factors at play. When it comes to industrialisation of a space (cloud, serverless etc) ... the change is obvious but most have inertia to it and won't take it seriously until it's large, at which point it's too late.