,
11 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
In 2018 my PROOF OF CONSPIRACY proposal focused on Israeli Joel Zamel not only successfully pitching the Trumps on an illegal media campaign pre-election and Saudi Arabia/UAE—via George Nader—funding it, but Russia being involved. Now this from Pulitzer Prize winner Ronan Farrow: 
1/ We now know Zamel and his representatives have repeatedly lied about who he met with and when. We know he formerly was employed by Oleg Deripaska and Dmitry Rybolovlev—two Russian oligarchs connected to Paul Manafort and Donald Trump respectively. I guess what I'm saying is...
2/ ...the publication of Ronan Farrow's article—which also has Zamel post-election bragging about helping Trump gets elected—has just closed the circle on Trump-Russia collusion with the assistance of at least two Gulf States. We have the ask, the acceptance, and the confession.
3/ Collusion is confirmed, and anyone who has been tracking a six-person—Trump, Rybolovlev, Manafort, Deripaska, Zamel, Nader—timeline knows it. None of us are sweating the misreporting by NBC and CBS; it's an annoyance only. There are some of us who know where Mueller is headed.
4/ Those of us who've done a dive into the Israeli piece—in my case, for a book—know that Trump will be found to have illegally colluded pre-election with Russia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE (at least). It's not in doubt anymore—the question is the timing of the disclosure.
5/ What's frustrating: those who've done the research *also* know the research isn't hidden or secret—rather, it's all in major media reports from around the world (including Israel). So as US media implies falsely that everything's over, major-media reporting confirms collusion.
6/ The problem for media—and for Trump-Russia researchers—is that the events confirming "Trump-Russia Plus" collusion (Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE) are scattered across 50 major-media articles. Someone has to synthesize them and then be paid attention to in doing so. That's why...
7/ ...writing a book's necessary—and why I'm doing it. I can tweet that we now have a completed timeline—offer, acceptance, confession—for Trump-Russia collusion, but nobody listens until it's put between two covers. On TV it can't be reduced to a soundbite so it can't translate.
8/ Two of the confessions we have are now publicly reported: Zamel (Israel) and Kilimnick (Russia). Nader (Saudi Arabia, UAE) is a Mueller cooperator and has given his confession, so far as we know, in private. And the 25 to 30 key events in the timeline have all been reported.
9/ It's incredible that on the same day a Pulitzer Prize winner—who unfortunately wrote his article as a feature-length piece rather than a news report, so it has an interminable soft lede and buried actual lede—closes the circle on collusion, we get these silly NBC/CBS reports.
10/ My point: if you were disheartened by one CBS and one NBC article that misrepresented an hour-long Richard Burr interview with a single pull-quote—which articles have already started coming apart—please don't be. Collusion and conspiracy occurred and the truth is coming. /end
