,
3 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
People believe current take bc it's consistent w the evidence, while the original version of the story was filled w/ contradictions & red flags.
I can see why you'd want to deflect given your tweets on this subject, but you might be better off engaging in some self-reflection.
I can see why you'd want to deflect given your tweets on this subject, but you might be better off engaging in some self-reflection.
Here are the tweets lecturing that I'm referring to...
When you have a set narrative and a lecture ready, you might be less willing to look carefully at the facts or approach a story with skepticism.
When you have a set narrative and a lecture ready, you might be less willing to look carefully at the facts or approach a story with skepticism.
Notice his tweets didn't even allow for the possibility that the assault didn't occur exactly as Smollett described. Scott was hardly alone in this approach. That's why it's hard to take the attempts to exonerate the press here seriously.
