But, as they say, the show must go on.
Boulder Meadows: 1970; 633 homes (514 owned; 119 rented) 26% pre-1976
Mapleton: 1961; 135 (all owned; 120 permanently affordable) 61% pre-1976
Orchard Grove: 1963; 216 (all owned) 69% pre-1976
Vista Village: 1968; 302 (all owned) 29% pre-1976
Carlisle asks it again: "I think in terms of putting teeth into some of these items that we've heard about, that would be.... " good, I think was the last word
Something for council to consider is "whether or not we want to provide dedicated resources" to be more proactive.
Including.... a bill to overturn the state ban on rent control.
1. Pad rent stabilization
2. Infrastructure
3. Energy efficiency
4. Land use code
5. Licensing of parks
20%, Yegian says
Carr: Could be done at a local level, but wants to do more research.
What are they getting in exchange for 4% lot rent increases every year, he asks?
In the packet, their feedback was that retired doctors and professors were moving in and then travelling most of the year, eroding the sense of community.
"Love to hear your ideas," Brockett says to staff.
Not a lot more detail on that right now; Yegian just says it needs to be explored.
Jones: Everybody in the city is entitled to basic infrastructure being provided. If a park owner is tasked with that and fails, there has got to be some mechanism that ensures thus. Surely they are obligated to meet those basic services.
Interesting....
Yegian: It depends on what we find. Next couple of months?
Jones: Will get get to it this council?
Yegian: I hesitate to say, not knowing the legal issues. We can always try and advance something.
Cheer from Morzel and silent applause from the audience.
This discussion is a wrap.