, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
As I’ve said endlessly, when Mike Schmidt of the NYT is bylined on a story that includes Don McGahn, it nearly always follows a pattern:

- inculcates Trump in wrong-doing
- distances McGahn from the decision
- positions McGahn as the overruled voice of reason

1/2
I am very much of the belief that McGahn or a proxy is one of Schmidt’s sources for these stories.

I’m also of the beliefs:

1) McGahn is no dummy
2) He has covered his own a** well
3) He has cooperated/is cooperating with Mueller
4) He’ll escape unscathed
5) Trump won’t

2/2
Damnit. That was supposed to be “inculpates” in the first tweet.

Why does stupid ducking autocorrect change correct words to incorrect ones?!$?!$?
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to The Hoarse Whisperer
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!