Back on Day 6 we went into MI5’s #PaedoFiles, as revealed @FOIACentre: foiacentre.com/news-CSA-inqui…
Today, inside the ‘dirt book’ of the Conservative whips’ office…
Background @FOIACentre from earlier in month: foiacentre.com/news-CSA-inqui…
His comments triggered one abuse survivor in public gallery to shout out: “It’s not ludicrous, actually. I was there.”
“To somebody in 2019, it is utterly inexplicable, that a very smart school… upright school, did nothing whatever about this man…”
“But it wasn’t a cover-up exactly. It wasn’t a conspiracy. But it was just not- the law was, for some peculiar reason, not enforced properly…”
“Cyril Smith, there is undoubtedly quite sufficient evidence that he was. But I’m sure there were more who went undetected, but not many.”
Michael Jopling, now Lord Jopling, chief whip from 1979 to 1983 for Margaret Thatcher’s government.
Turns out he kept his dirt book, ie ALL “whips notes” written by whips for him at the time.
And #CSAinquiry lawyers searched through them for relevant material…
This was why whips gathered, eg, info on MPs’ marital problems, he said.
Jopling confirmed that it referred to Geoffrey Dickens MP.
[Dickens, of course, notably campaigned against paedophilia.]
Paper did not run story at the time, I understand.
Note was about Peter Hayman. See MI5 #PaedoFiles on him: foiacentre.com/news-CSA-inqui…
Note probably 1981, when Nicholas Budgen, the late Conservative MP, was a whip.
Bg on Michael Havers: foiacentre.com/news-Playland-…
Andrew O’Connor, counsel for Westminster investigation at inquiry, replied: “You may not be alone in that.”
“Alan Clark asked if he was mad.”
“Sadly, they gave him the benefit of the doubt.”
He thought that police or DPP told Michael Havers. Whatever it was, it never broke.
And a clash at #CSAinquiry that exposes how Alexis Jay and her panel are being steered away from key evidence.
All covered in part 2 of my tweet summary tomorrow of Day 10 of Westminster hearings at #CSAinquiry.