,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
1/ This relates to an attempted suspension a year or so ago, vetoed by the leader's office. The most interesting thing for me about these leak stories is the response by the Labour Party, which is perhaps best described as angry denial...
2/ Here is the response in The Sunday Times. The problem is that the party clearly don't accept that what was going on, with the leader's office clearly *approving* and *disapproving* disciplinary sanctions, was problematic. And they stand by the fiction that it was "suggestion" 
3/ And at the same time they strongly assert that this all ended when Jennie Formby became General Secretary. But since they have such an odd (and obviously inaccurate) interpretation of what constitutes interference, how can the current processes realistically be trusted?
4/ Read these emails and see whether you see this as "suggestions"
