“We undertake these roles... by focusing on prevention.”
There’s been no explanation from the province on why that is, Cressy adds.
When asked about possible job cuts, he says there could be fewer staff offering TPH services but won’t speculate at timelines. “We’re not done yet,” he adds.
He adds the city has been "honest with residents" about the impact.
My story with @ieva_lucs:
cbc.ca/news/canada/to…
Why is it so different from the city’s number? That’s not yet clear.
And why is it different from their *own* previous estimate in Elliott’s tweet? The response from @traviskann:
Cressy says he’s not prepared to accept the “downloading of provincial responsibility onto cities without a fight.” He hopes province backs down but says city will have to find money somewhere if not.
"(We) are concerned about the serious implication of proposed operational changes to public health units," says @OntariosDoctors president @DocSchmadia: newswire.ca/news-releases/…
1) For @TVO, @MattGurney says despite the cuts, Toronto can still decide what health programs it funds: tvo.org/article/blame-…
2) @GordPerks argues it's not that simple:
One key thing it notes: All the city’s information from the province has been through calls.
“Nothing has been provided in writing” to the city or @TOPublicHealth.
But the city has shown its work. The province has not.