Thread by @studentactivism

This is a fascinating chart.

https://twitter.com/_Jon_Green/status/1126526257993273344

One thing I noticed poking around the data: They also asked the standard first-choice question, and on that question it's a pretty pro-Warren poll. So take her second-place showing in the chart above with a small grain of salt.

Here are the first-choice numbers:

Biden 33
Sanders 17
Warren 16
Buttigieg 9
Harris 7
O'Rourke 4

Having said that, though, here's what you get if you subtract the "hell no" number from the "maybe" number for each candidate:

Biden +29
Warren +27
Buttigieg +17
Harris +16
Sanders +10
Beto +9
Booker +5
Abrams Even
Castro Even

Everyone else is underwater.

Below about 10% consideration, the "hell no" numbers seem to turn into "never heard of him" numbers, with everyone clustered around 20% except for the somewhat-more-hated De Blasio and Gabbard.

But if you look at the 10%+ consideration group only, and rank them by how many voters would NOT be willing to consider them, here's what you get:

Sanders 28%
Biden 20%
Gillibrand 20%
O'Rourke 18%
Klobuchar 16%

With everyone else between 12% and 15%.

(I was with Gillibrand on the Franken thing, but yeah, it really does seem to have done huge damage to her candidacy.)