,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
This is cyber-ignorance masquerading as common sense. I am slightly annoyed enough to put out a short thread on the known issues with EVMs as we know it today. Let us start.
1. Do we know the *full design of the EVM* in public domain?
No.
1. Do we know the *full design of the EVM* in public domain?
No.
2. Have we audited the software?
No.
3. Have we ensured that the unique number in every EVM Is unique and is crypto secure?
No
4. Have unique numbers in EVMs did not match in the past?
Yes. See this case.
No.
3. Have we ensured that the unique number in every EVM Is unique and is crypto secure?
No
4. Have unique numbers in EVMs did not match in the past?
Yes. See this case.
5. If physical proximity security is compromised, are EVMs vulnerable?
Yes. (Every machine whatever it is, is vulnerable)
6. Were procedural security not followed w/ EVMs allowing physical access to random strangers?
Yes (Hence the EVM frenzy spreading all out)
Yes. (Every machine whatever it is, is vulnerable)
6. Were procedural security not followed w/ EVMs allowing physical access to random strangers?
Yes (Hence the EVM frenzy spreading all out)
7. And finally are the people who are responsible (ECI) credible?
No (Hence the EVM frenzy spreading further)
So trust has to be earned and not demanded. And ECI's trustworthiness at this point with EVMs is pretty close to zero.
(Makes no difference who wins the elections)
#
No (Hence the EVM frenzy spreading further)
So trust has to be earned and not demanded. And ECI's trustworthiness at this point with EVMs is pretty close to zero.
(Makes no difference who wins the elections)
#
