💠I am in favor of opening impeachment hearings.
💠I believe Nancy Pelosi is handling matters correctly.
Here is how both of the above can be true at the same time.
latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/…
Forget the headlines. They often pull phrases out of context to get clicks. Ignore the Tweets.
The meat starts at the 1.30 minute mark
I'll list Pelosi’s main points, as I understand them:
Kimmel pointed out that Mueller handed the matter to Congress, and he wants to know if Congress is taking up the task.
Pelosi says, “We’ve been on that path for a while, and when we do get to where we’re going, we are going to be ready.”
Kimmel says: “It feels like we’ve been on the path for a really long time.”
Pelosi points out that the Dems didn’t have a House majority until this year, and the first month, government was shut down.
Pause to consider how much better it is for Pelosi to say, “We are on a quest to put the truth before the American people,” than to say, “We’re on a quest to impeach.”
See:
She then adds: “We [the House Democrats] understand our oath of office to support and defend our constitution of the United States.”
Take absolute statements like: "if we impeach, X will happen" or "if we don't, Y will happen" with skepticism.
All future predictions are guesswork. (Even mine 😉)
(She adds that only Trump knows better than she does what he has done wrong)
Yes, the Speaker may know things we don't know.
She implies that GOP senate will acquit the president, whatever the evidence shows (which I believe changes the calculus of how to move forward).
terikanefield-blog.com/things-to-do/
Pelosi also promises that “As we go down this path, the American people will know the truth . . . "
She also says the House Dems will be “ready” before 2020. (8.16 minute mark)
(Notice that she's saying the president WILL be held accountable.)
There are a few reasons I believe a Nixon outcome isn't guaranteed.
Nixon didn’t have Fox and right wing media. John Dean said that Nixon might have survived if he'd had Fox. politico.com/magazine/story…
was still Democrat.
The shift of the two parties creating our current levels of polarization was not complete until Reagan. What do I mean? See👇
Remember: I am in favor of impeachment. But don't think it's a magic bullet.
Destroying the “deep state” means destroying all those regulatory agencies that prevent them from doing what they please.
Mitch McConnell, Devin Nunes, Lindsay Graham and others are destroyers. They like Trump because he is a destroyer.
Impeachment will not change their ways.
Remember the Trump-FOX-GOP is resorting to extreme and destructive measure because they understand that their medium and long term prospects are not good.
The GOP is the party of white Christians — a shrinking group.
The Democrats are the party of the young and diverse communities, which are growing.
The future belongs to the Democrats, which is why the GOP is panicking.
As long as the Democrats don’t make serious errors, the future is ours.
I'm working on another thread for how to deal with the Republicans without helping them destroy everything. Stay tuned.
End/
Also people all got their news from the same sources (what John Dean was getting at with his "fox" comment)
Put another way, we shared the same public sphere, which made rational discourse possible.
His position is also exactly the same as Pelosi's.
I'm not seeing too many commentaries calling Pelosi "nuanced."
Could that be because she's a woman?
*steps down from soapbox*
Adding: Of course the hope is that if enough evidence emerges that Trump has been propped up by Russian money (as credible public evidence suggests), the GOP will turn on him . . .
Either can happen.
I've written about why they "believe" lies: slate.com/news-and-polit…