,
6 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
Does traditional media want to stop on-line radicalization? Here’s a simple question to test:
Q: Can you openly and forever admit that it is, and always has been, absolutely impossible to logically infer Xenophobia from someone wanting immigration restricted?
I bet MSM can’t.
Q: Can you openly and forever admit that it is, and always has been, absolutely impossible to logically infer Xenophobia from someone wanting immigration restricted?
I bet MSM can’t.
Here’s a second one:
Q: Can we once and for all admit that there is some link between an eagerness to kill civilians in suicide attacks & ideology which is not uniformly distributed?
Again, MSM can do this simply from data without editorializing. This would slow radicalization.
Q: Can we once and for all admit that there is some link between an eagerness to kill civilians in suicide attacks & ideology which is not uniformly distributed?
Again, MSM can do this simply from data without editorializing. This would slow radicalization.
A third question:
Q: Can we admit that it is at least formally possible that males could be better suited to at least a few high prestige and high paying cognitive activities than females without charging bigotry, bias, and misogyny?
Media saying this would stop radicalization.
Q: Can we admit that it is at least formally possible that males could be better suited to at least a few high prestige and high paying cognitive activities than females without charging bigotry, bias, and misogyny?
Media saying this would stop radicalization.
A fourth way for MSM to stop radicalization:
Q: Can we stop reporting on one skin color being on watch for evilness?
Publishing racist arguments radicalizes majority groups. Super easy to stop. But not cheap. “I can’t be friends with X people.” articles get clicks. We get it.
Q: Can we stop reporting on one skin color being on watch for evilness?
Publishing racist arguments radicalizes majority groups. Super easy to stop. But not cheap. “I can’t be friends with X people.” articles get clicks. We get it.
In summary: the denial of basic reality enforced by threatening to make anyone unemployable if they use their eyes and their brains is making the loony right attractive. And for what??? These lies don’t bear a minute’s scrutiny. They just make our institutional Left look insane.
“It’s not the YouTube, stupid. It’s the New York Times.”
When the mainstream media acknowledges that it has been taken over by activism making mere acknowledgment of reality equivalent to unemployability & being a pariah, we will end this radicalization epidemic.
And not until.
When the mainstream media acknowledges that it has been taken over by activism making mere acknowledgment of reality equivalent to unemployability & being a pariah, we will end this radicalization epidemic.
And not until.
