, 10 tweets, 3 min read Read on Twitter
Tommy Robinson has characterised his case as an establishment crackdown, but his Facebook live posed a real threat to actual victims

For the first time, The Independent can reveal how close he came to causing the Huddersfield grooming trials to collapse

independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
The defendants had been split into three trials for practicality, meaning that evidence, witnesses and victims would crossover

Judge Geoffrey Marson imposed a reporting restriction under the Contempt of Court Act postponing reports of proceedings until the end of the last trial
When Robinson broke it in such extraordinary fashion - a Facebook live video viewed by 10,000 people in real-time and millions since - it was at a particularly sensitive phase

The jury was out in the second trial, with first group awaiting sentence and the third yet to come
Judge Marson ordered the video's deletion and jailed Robinson on 25 May 2018, hours after it was broadcast

His imprisonment, and a separate restriction banning reporting of proceedings against Robinson (that was challenged by The Independent) sparked international media coverage
On the first day back after the weekend, five defence lawyers backed an application to dismiss the jury, arguing it was “inconceivable” that jurors had not seen Robinson’s live stream or heard about it

One juror had mentioned his name as they re-started deliberations
Judge Marson dismissed the application and refused to question members of the jury on whether they had watched Robinson’s video

Who knows what they would have found out if they did. They later convicted all defendants and the third trial went ahead

independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
Another judge might have made a different decision, causing a lengthy retrial or the case to fully collapse

Robinson endangered the victims he claims to support. Despite his claims to "expose" grooming gangs, his main defence was that he read charges from a BBC article
Robinson claimed the “mainstream media” were not reporting case, but journalists from the Huddersfield Examiner were in court

He has also repeated false allegations that I broke the restriction with this article, which plainly does not report proceedings independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
Robinson has also accused me of breaking the separate section 4 on reporting proceedings against him, which I did not

The article was published before he appeared in court and before Judge Marson imposed the restriction

It reported his arrest, not court proceedings.
I successfully challenged that restriction in writing, along with a local journo in court, meaning Robinson's imprisonment could be reported

Reporters can and do fight disproportionate reporting restrictions. The one Robinson broke was not one of them

independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Lizzie Dearden
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!