Thread by @RepGosar

I just introduced #StoptheCensorshipAct to combat Big Tech’s censorship of political speech.

Learn more 👇

The #StoptheCensorshipAct revokes unprecedented immunities given to #BigTech for censorship of ‘objectionable’ material but retains immunities when acting in good faith to remove unlawful content or providing users the option to filter: i.e, Twitter’s Quality Filter

Big Tech has demonstrated a clear bias against conservatives and censorship represents an existential threat to free speech, free markets and free elections. #StoptheCensorshipAct

Big Tech has been given blanket immunity by section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. They claim a ‘platform’s discretion for removing content but claim ‘publishers’ aren’t liable when they monetize their users’ content. #StoptheCensorshipAct

Despite their claims, Big Tech does not always foreclose on violent/obscene behavior; in fact, they often monetize it-but they do police political speech. Big Tech’s immunity should strictly be for good faith efforts to remove actual unlawful material. #StoptheCensorshipAct

#StoptheCensorshipAct facilitates the option for a self-imposed safe space, or unfettered free speech, whichever the user chooses. Currently, the only content moderation options are versions of whatever material Big Tech wants you to see.

#StoptheCensorshipAct ensures that there is no use of presumed ‘public’ desire not to be exposed to ‘objectionable’ material to justify the suppression of supposedly ‘objectionable’ political speech.