,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
What a ridiculous, pathetic smear. It's like they're not even trying any more nytimes.com/2019/08/02/us/… 
The article is yet another attempt to portray Tulsi's criticisms of US foreign policy in the most ominous possible light, by connecting it to Russia, "isolationism," and David Duke (of course). Unfortunately for the author, these continued smears are just raising her profile
What does "Russia-gate skepticism" have to do with "isolationism" or the idea that America "should stand alone"? Nothing. It's the oldest trick in the book to equate advocacy of anti-intervention with retreat from the world. Just another bogus attempt to delegitimize her
Interesting that the NYT author, Nellie Bowles, is reportedly in a romantic relationship with Bari Weiss, who earlier this year infamously described Tulsi as a "toady" for Assad, and then failed spectacularly to substantiate the claim
