Both are figments of imaginations. Both make for fantastic reading. Both have no conclusive proofs.
No wonder Mithyalogists makes the best conspiracy theorists.
1/n
If yes, why does he not put it out? Who is paying whom? In what way? Is there a money trail?
2/n
3/n
4/n
In Feb 2017, Koenraad Elst worte Pattanaik was “shifting towards a stance critical of Doniger, apparently under the influence of Rajiv Malhotra’s criticism of his own ‘Donigeresque’ approach to Indian stories.”
5/n
Alas, ideological balancing is no fig leaf for lack of scholarship.
Quotes by Pattanaik and Koenraad Elst from
archive.mid-day.com/news/2009/oct/…
pragyata.com/mag/a-diversit…
n/n