exclusion of suitably qualified applicants to join means that the ACMD is losing its independence. A thread to explain follows…
working protocol was put in place to protect the independence of the ACMD from ministerial
interference.
gov.uk/government/pub…
the ACMD by an appointments panel had not been appointed by ministers after vetting of their
social media had revealed disagreements with government policies and ministerial statements.
suitably qualified applicants. This has not been provided.
respected lawyer whose expertise on British drug law is internationally recognised (the ACMD
currently has no qualified lawyer as a member).
tweeted disagreements with government ministers.
theguardian.com/politics/2019/…
happen again. If ministers take decisions on who can join the ACMD on the basis of whether or not they agree with government policies, then it is no longer an independent body. Which is why I have resigned.
work (with @ADPconsultancy) on reducing opioid-related deaths in the UK gov.uk/government/pub… ...
members or on the civil servants who work with the ACMD, who have always been highly
professional.