Step one - things go public.
Intel Committee to hold open hearings [witnesses appear with the TV cameras rolling].
Both Dem + Republican chair will be able to grill witnesses for up to 90 mins. Members get 5 mins each.
Intel Committee will pass report on the investigation to Judiciary. [Big moment as will also be published. Basically the case for impeachment]
Judiciary decides on articles. If yes, House votes.
Angered that their ability to subpoena witnesses will need to be approved by the Dems [who have majority in the House].
Dems - evidence of high crimes, must be investigated, history is watching, no one above the law
GOP - Dems 'obsessed' with overturning 2016 vote, not a fair process, it's all 'partisan', is a 'sad day'
Only three other US presidents have faced such an inquiry. Historic moment.
2 Democrats voted against
[Peterson of Minnesota, Van Drew of New Jersey]
One independent voted against
[Justin Amash, formerly Republican]
Zero Republicans vote for
But... Republicans have been trying fiercely to frame this whole push as partisan. A vote split almost perfectly along party lines will help them do that.
Their impulse is to move quickly, jumping on momentum of Ukraine scandal + wrapping up before 2020 election push.
But move too fast + they a) seem like they're rushing process to depose Trump and b) could miss key evidence
"I didn't have one negative Republican vote, which is a very unusual thing. Not one negative Republican vote."