An interesting series by @RobertPLewis re Q Anon.
For me, it’s a fascinating topic... and Robert is thorough in what he does.
I’m going into it with just a few thoughts...
For me, it’s a fascinating topic... and Robert is thorough in what he does.
I’m going into it with just a few thoughts...
1. “Is Q real?”
Well... it’s real, whatever the hell it is. I agree with Patrick that it has the characteristics of a ‘psy-op’ AND that all psy-ops aren’t ‘bad’.
Whomever it is, or whatever group, knows what they are doing.
Well... it’s real, whatever the hell it is. I agree with Patrick that it has the characteristics of a ‘psy-op’ AND that all psy-ops aren’t ‘bad’.
Whomever it is, or whatever group, knows what they are doing.
2. “Is Q Good? Bad?”
I only followed Q in the very early stages... and my motivation was to assess ‘intent’.
Anyone/Anything that grows that quickly has ‘inherent risks’ associated with it - I wanted to know what those risks were.
Imo, the biggest risk was disinfo.
I only followed Q in the very early stages... and my motivation was to assess ‘intent’.
Anyone/Anything that grows that quickly has ‘inherent risks’ associated with it - I wanted to know what those risks were.
Imo, the biggest risk was disinfo.
3. Disinfo!
My assessment concluded that disinfo was more of a factor of those interpreting Q Drops than the Q Drops themseves.
That is, to say, that people were running wild with little info.
The drops, imo, were more like ‘food for thought’ - the disinfo was ‘poor thinking’
My assessment concluded that disinfo was more of a factor of those interpreting Q Drops than the Q Drops themseves.
That is, to say, that people were running wild with little info.
The drops, imo, were more like ‘food for thought’ - the disinfo was ‘poor thinking’
Some of that ‘poor thinking’ was intentional efforts to derail the movement, imo.
In any case, it’s a fascinating topic and Robert is good at what he does - I’m going to give it a fair shake!
“The proof is always in the pudding.”
In any case, it’s a fascinating topic and Robert is good at what he does - I’m going to give it a fair shake!
“The proof is always in the pudding.”
Here is Part 2.
Last Thought:
Idk what you think, but I THINK Steve Bannon is a mad scientist and I’m on record predicting his involvement with ‘Q’! 😂
Cheers - 🇺🇸
Idk what you think, but I THINK Steve Bannon is a mad scientist and I’m on record predicting his involvement with ‘Q’! 😂
Cheers - 🇺🇸
