“Our client is legally entitled to Anonymity.”
Really? Says who...
Point to the law/protection that affords that entitlement - it doesn’t exist (that I know of).
The ICIG has to honor that, but show me where media & private citizens are required.
Really? Says who...
Point to the law/protection that affords that entitlement - it doesn’t exist (that I know of).
The ICIG has to honor that, but show me where media & private citizens are required.
If you want to argue that it’s ‘of bad taste’ to do it... that is a whole different story. Ordinarily, I’d probably even agree...
But probably not in this situation, where unnamed people get fluffed w/selective leaks in order to aide a ‘coup narrative’.
But probably not in this situation, where unnamed people get fluffed w/selective leaks in order to aide a ‘coup narrative’.
What these people are doing is as damaging to future whistleblowers as was the Kavanaugh hearings were to legitimate victims of sexual violence...
Your methods are rotting ‘whistleblower protections’ to the core!
I want to see the legal basis for their argument.
Your methods are rotting ‘whistleblower protections’ to the core!
I want to see the legal basis for their argument.
