This is littered w/falsehoods. The witnesses verified the accuracy of their transcripts, no one in minority disputed them. GOP had ample opportunity to dispute if they so chose, but did not. As for "only releasing" information: WH "only released" a *rough* transcript of the call. 
WH has also blocked testimony, refused to relinquish documents and has pushed repeatedly for violation of whistleblower protections. None of what I am saying is politically charged. All of what I am saying is representative of factual reality.
As for "not having a lawyer," this is a statement out of context. The public hearings are not a trial, therefore no requirement for his attys to be invited. This period is investigation/evidence gathering period. When the hearings end in House Intel, it will go to House Judiciary
Then, once in House Judic where articles of impeachment will finally be considered, Trump can attend, have lawyers present etc.
No amount of tweets completely misrepresenting the inquiry will change what is going to happen now and over the next few weeks.
No amount of tweets completely misrepresenting the inquiry will change what is going to happen now and over the next few weeks.
For more information on how the inquiry actually functions based on the House vote that passed on Halloween, background available here: courthousenews.com/house-nails-do…
