At that rate, it would cost 100 BILLION POUNDS to 'undo' the Beeching cuts.
So this is a commitment to 0.5% of that total.
Remember: Just because a number sounds impressive, doesn't mean that it is.
As you might suspect, it is more complex than people like to paint it. And in many cases the cuts it proposed made sense.
Beeching was commissioned by the CONSERVATIVE, and infamously corrupt, Transport Secretary Ernest Marples.
This turned out to be rather lucrative when the firm won contracts for Hammersmith Flyover, the M1 and much, much more.
From his Vineyard in Monte Carlo.
Which he fled to after it was discovered his companies had been dodging tax for 30 years.
The treasury tried to freeze his assets. But he'd already shifted them to tax havens abroad.
Ask yourself: why would WILSON implement a bunch of cuts that were the pet project of Ernest Marples, Lord of Tarmac, Fraud of Fraud Hall?
Because, as I say, many of them were necessary and overdue.
Because we now live in a world where we have learned that the car CANNOT be the king
No.
Does that mean that there aren't hundreds of miles of railway that SHOULD be rebuilt and reopened?
No.
But it also doesn't mean that Beeching was somehow a malicious government plot to 'kill' railways. Labour OR Conservative
And that sinking to Johnsonian levels of misinformation is beneath both his office and the example he has set so far
londonreconnections.com/2013/the-beech…
londonreconnections.com/2013/the-beech…
londonreconnections.com/2013/beeching-…
/ends