, 31 tweets, 8 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
(Thread) New State Dept. Docs

I'll analyze the new info in parts—because there is so much.

As I read and analyze, I am updating my timeline with the new information. New stuff is in gold.

impeachment-trump.com
(I have no proofreader, and I do have keyboard gremlins)
1/ The new docs are here: americanoversight.org/state-departme…

For now I’ll focus on the State Dept and leave Nunes for later.

We already know that in late 2018 / early 2019, Giuliani was talking to disgruntled former Ukrainian prosecutors willing to push false stories .
2/ . . . in order to ingratiate themselves with Trump.

We learn from the new docs that Giuliani sent memos to Pompeo and Devin Nunes detailing his discussions with Ukrainian prosecutors regarding Yovanovitch, the Bidens, and claims that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election.
3/ We already knew that on March 20, John Solomon published this piece in the Hill. thehill.com/hilltv/rising/…

Lutsenko told Solomon that Yovanovitch gave him a "do not prosecute list during their first meeting." He also accused the embassy of mishandling 4.4 million in funds.
4/ George Kent testified that he saw the list, and it was a forgery, filled with misspellings.

The nature of the misspellings indicated to him that the creator of the list was either Czech or Serbian. Attached to the list was a business card that he had used temporarily in 2015.
5/ We learn from the new docs that on March 26: Secretary of State Pompeo had one of several phone calls with Rudy Giuliani.

At least one call was set up by Madeleine Westerhout, who was White House Director of Oval Office operations.
6/ We also learn that on March 27 Westerhout complained that she had "been trying and getting nowhere through regular channels" when she tried to connect Giuliani with Pompeo.

[Narrator: the contact was at Trump's direction, but the State Dept. was reluctant to get involved]
7/ We learn that a March 28 State Dept. email list includes a list of scheduled calls for Pompeo.

One of those is a call scheduled with Giuliani on March 29 and Devin Nunes on April 1.
8/ On April 5: Six former ambassadors to Ukraine (including Taylor) wrote to the State Dept. to express their concern about the unwarranted attacks on Yovanovitch. americanoversight.org/state-departme…
9/ April 12: House Democrats, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and House Foreign Affairs committee chairman Eliot Engel objected to Yovanovitch's treatment.

Sondland, remember, pushed back against the accusation that he was running a “shadow” or “back channel” operation in Ukraine⤵️
10/ Sondland said “everyone was in the loop,” and he (and his fellow Amigos) kept the NSC and State Dept. informed of their activities.

Sondland named all the big names and said, “They knew what we were doing and why.”

This new cache of docs backs up his testimony.
11/ Also remember when the news first broke and Giuliani waved his phone around and said he had proof that he wasn’t going rogue; he was acting at the direction of the State Dept?

We also have confessions like the one I flagged here:
12/ If you want to refresh your memory, this was the moment in Hill's testimony when she described how she came to understand that Sondland was on a “political errand”—and that the highest levels of the administration were aware. ⤵️

13/ One more important bit: Volker testified that Pompeo didn’t always support Giuliani; Pompeo tried to distance himself from Giuliani.

Okay, now for my analysis on what this tells us about Trump, Giuliani, Sondland, Volker, and the State Dept . . .
14/ This is the story of how Trump corrupts people and institutions.

Sondland in his testimony, described it this way: At first, what Trump wanted was vague—he and Giuliani wanted a general commitment that Zelensky would pursue investigations.
15/ Then gradually more conditions were added until, by August, both Sondland and Taylor realized that Trump was withholding both the White House meeting and security aid until the Ukrainians announced an investigation that would ensnare Joe Biden.

This is how Trump operates.
16/ Trump corrupts people. He pulls them in. The increasing insidiousness is so gradual that the person gradually wakes up to the realization that he or she is deeply embroiled.

As James Comey said, “Trump eats your soul in small bites.” (h/t RobAnybody2)
17/ The victim then, from fear of exposure, helps Trump obstruct the inquiry. This compromises them and embroils them even more.

Some people have the strength to withstand Trump’s overtures.

Those who do find themselves attacked with a vengeance.
18/ With a meanness of spirit that can only be called cruelty, Trump crushes people who stand in his way or refuse the bait he dangles.

He endangers their lives and ruins their livelihood.

If they take the bait (flattery, promises of wealth or power) this compromises them. . .
19/ . . . and then he owns them.

It looks to me like Trump compromised Pompeo by pulling him into the discussions and leaving a paper trail.

Also remember this: The President cannot, by definition, run a shadow campaign. He is the nation’s chief foreign service officer.
20/ What Trump can do is corrupt the system by setting people against each other.

He can manipulate people, keeping them off balance and scared.

A house divided itself cannot stand—and Trump is intentionally creating division while infecting the system with corruption.
21/ One way Trump inoculates himself is by making sure that lots of people at the top are guilty or compromised.

More analysis to come after I digest the next bit of new information.
22/ This has long been my theory.
Putin operates the same way.

Note that if Trump's Ukraine shakedown had succeeded, he would have also compromised Zelenskiy.

I don't believe the Republicans saying that the exposure of all of this hurts Zelenskiy. . .
23/ Zelenskiy must take care to stay out of this. He cannot make a statement either way. If anything he has to appease Trump.

Ukrainians understand the pressure he was under.

Personally I think he demonstrated an extraordinary level of political savvy. He walked a tightrope.
24/ I think Zelenskiy understands that he was saved by the bell.

Johnsons's suggestion that this should have been handled behind the scenes instead of in open hearings is absurd.

Really? The GOP would have stopped all of this if Schiff had told them privately they should?🙄
25/ Moreover, Ukraine is helped enormously by all of this evidence in open Congressional hearings that the theories that they interfered in our election is pure bunk.

Ukraine is also helped by these hearings educating the American public on their situation.
I keep thinking I'll end this thread and start a new thread later . . . but I want to add this, just because I agree 😉


I'm getting a lot of questions. I'm keeping a list. I'll do my best over the next week or so, but for now I'm still reading.
Whenever NBC News publishes one of my opinion pieces, they put in an "i."

I turn in my op eds this way: Zelensky.

They change it to Zelenskiy.



Will attach hard evidence in the next tweet.
Hard evidence ⤵️(unless I also have eyeball gremlins)

I yield back the rest of my time.

nbcnews.com/think/opinion/…
In other words, we're all correct.

I'll go with that.
My threads (the main ones) are also blog posts.

This blog posts combines a short thread last night with this one: terikanefield-blog.com/new-state-depa…

P.S. My technical staff (my husband) fixed the subscribe function on my blog 👏
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!