THIS is what the Republicans wanted to avoid:
a Harvard Law Professor testifying about the fact that "the President has committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors for his personal benefit."
And there you have it.
PS. He clerked for Souter, who is no radical lefty.
a Harvard Law Professor testifying about the fact that "the President has committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors for his personal benefit."
And there you have it.
PS. He clerked for Souter, who is no radical lefty.
This is BRILLIANT. Feldman is testifying as to the history of the Constitutional Convention, and the debate over the removal of the impeachment clause because re-election would take care of removal.
It remained, because Madison and Mason, among other Republicans, insisted on it.
And now it undercuts the @GOP's argument that the election should take the place of impeachment
And now it undercuts the @GOP's argument that the election should take the place of impeachment
@GOP "High crimes and misdemeanors means connected to the office" of the Presidency.
He's a great professor, including to the general public.
He's a great professor, including to the general public.
@GOP Damn. He's testifying that there are at least three acts that are high crimes and misdemeanors, including soliciting a foreign leader to interfere in an election and announce investigations into a political rival.
