Thread by @EpigeneticWhisp

The Sorry State of Vaccine Science
Lies, Deceit, & Corruption

A tweet series by The Epigenetic Whisperer

Scentism sees science as absolute/only justifiable access 2 the truth. Scientism warps science 2 fit its dogma. Truth becomes lies. Many r deceived by the corruption.

1

Vaccine Science is actually Vaccine Scientism which I hope to clearly illuminate in this tweet series. Those who are pro-vax usually roll their eyes when u point out the deep corruption that exists in medical science. It’s not like this is a unique phenomenon.

2

Throughout history, several industries have produced “science” to support their toxic product. Think tobacco, DDT, leaded gas, asbestos, & most recently glyphosate. Medical/vaccine science is no different. Any time u have a profitable product which is harmful to ppl &/or..

3

The environment, the industry responsible goes into overdrive generating science 2 defend their turf. The topic of the history/current state of med science will b covered in another series. I addressed a bit of vax science corruption here as well:

https://twitter.com/epigeneticwhisp/status/1212101702364434432?s=21

4

Ever since Edward Jenner took fluid from a cowpox blister & scratched it into the skin of James Phipps, an 8 yr old boy, in 1796, legions have claimed vax’s safe/effective. I mean he didn’t die. It must have been the vax that saved him!

In the last 50 yrs, a cornucopia of...

5

Science has been manufactured to give the illusion of vaccine’s safety/efficacy. I’ll throughly deconstruct this illusion a bit later. 1st, let’s just briefly dive into the current state of medical science. I point u 2 an excellent, well-researched book on the topic..

6

Bad Pharma👉amazon.com/Bad-Pharma-Com…
We like 2 imagine that medicine is based on evidence & the results of fair testing/clinical trials. In reality, those tests & trials r often profoundly flawed [& corrupted]?

I think it’s worth quoting the main thesis of his book ...

7

“Drugs r tested by the ppl who manufacture them, in poorly designed trials, on hopelessly small #s of weird, unrepresentative patients & analyzed using techniques which r flawed by design, in such a way that they exaggerate the benefits of treatments. Unsurprisingly, these..

8

Trials tend 2 produce results that favour the manufacturer. When trials throw up results that companies don’t like, they r perfectly entitled 2 hide them from Drs/patients, so we only ever see a distorted picture of any drug’s true effects. Regulators see most of
the trial..

9

Data but only from early on in a drug’s life & even then they don’t give this data 2 Drs or patients, or even 2 other parts of government. This distorted evidence is then communicated/applied in a distorted fashion. In their 40 yrs of practice after leaving med school, Drs..

10

Hear about what works thru ad hoc oral traditions, from sales reps, colleagues or journals. But those colleagues can b in the pay of drug companies–often undisclosed–& the journals r 2. & so r the patient groups. & finally, academic pprs, which every1 thinks of as objective..

11

R often covertly planned/written by ppl who work directly 4 the cos., w/o disclosure. Sometimes whole academic journals r even owned outright by 1 drug Co. Aside from all this, 4 several of the most important/enduring problems in med, we have no idea what the best treatment..

12

cuz it’s not in any1’s financial interest 2 conduct any trials at all. These r ongoing probs/altho ppl have claimed 2 fix many of them, 4 the most part they’ve failed; so these probs persist, but worse than evr, cuz now ppl can pretend that everything is fine after all.”

13

Now here’s the kicker, Ben Goldacre, the Bad Pharma author, is pro-vax! If this isn’t the biggest case of cognitive dissonance I don’t know what is! He meticulously documents how corrupt the current state of medical science is yet thinks vax’s r fine! For an explanation,

14

I refer u 2 this article whale.to/vaccine/behind…. Ben correctly & incisively called out the deep corruption of Med Science but has historically relied on highly flawed epedimiological studies to inform his vax views. Think about it, he calls out the corrupt med science

15

Which is highly regulated & has 2 overcome many safety hurdles (even though they cheat this process) as compared to vaccines that are classified as biologics & don’t have 2 face any safety hurdles! In fact, according 2 a legal document..

16

“Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccines," Health & Human Services (HHS) has openly admitted 2 not having filed any vax safety reports in over 30 yrs.
gardenweb.com/discussions/55…

What you talking about Willis? This was a requirement of the 1986 Vaccine act signed into law by...

17

Millions from. There’s also a blatant, out-in-the-open, revolving door b/n Big Pharma & these agencies. Lastly, many have built their career on the vax’s r safe/effective mantra. 2 admit otherwise would be committing career suicide. As Upton Sinclair so eloquently put..

18

“It is difficult 2 get a man 2 understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.”

It’s also important 2 mention in Goldacre’s book where he covers the emerging field of “research about research”. The Meta-Analysis studies’ conclusions r clear.

19

Those studies which are funded by the company itself produces an overwhelmingly positive result. This isn’t debatable. It’s scientific fact. I would argue it’s just common sense. Also, it’s important to note that after 4 yrs, 9 of 10 studies remained unpublished.

20

We’re being hoodwinked folks. Vax science is built on a flimsy house of cards where the slightest beeeze of awareness will cause them 2 tumble down. Why do u think the current zeitgeist is 2 attack anti-vaxxers so viciously? If ur science is solid, why personally attack..

21

Anti-vaxxers & personally destroy careers like Andrew Wakefield’s or getting Whistleblowers like Dr. William Thomson of the CDC 2 backtrack his position via bigger titles/more $? What message do u think this sends 2 the rest of Drs who see the truth but r afraid 2 speak up?

22

Let’s expose Vax science from a different angle/discuss epidemiological/biological science.

Epidemiology is the study (scientific/systematic/data-driven) of the distribution (frequency/pattern) & determinants (causes/risk factors) of health-related states/events/diseases..

23

in specified populations (neighborhood, school, city, state, country, global).

Biological Science, OTOH, is the study of life/living organisms, their life cycles, adaptations & environment. Biological sciences include biochemistry, microbiology and evolutionary biology.

24

Not that it’s a competition but if I had to choose...Biological Science (BS) > Epidemiological Science (ES). Ideally they work together to triangulate the truth, establish new breakthroughs, etc. Although both can be manipulated, it’s much easier & way more prevalent in ES.

25

Epidemiology, when done well, can expand upon BS Truths 2 turn correlation into causation. What do I mean?

There is a strong, direct correlation b/n rain & umbrellas being unfurled👉does unfurling umbrellas cause rain. Or does rain cause umbrellas to be unfurled?

26

An epidemiological study establishes this correlation b/n umbrella/rain but is not good at establishing causation. This is where Biological Science (BS) comes in. Understanding the exact biochem pathways of tobacco smoking damage & having the epidemiology 2 back it up..

27

Is a powerful 1-2 punch. Epidemiologic Science (ES), however, can easily become a slave to $ conflicts of interest & data can b omitted/misconstrued which may be difficult 2 detect. Here is a reference that discusses how ES can b subject 2 biases: healthknowledge.org.uk/e-learning/epi…

28

In this series I critiqued a dozen vax-autism epidemiological studies (ES)that declared there was no link.

https://twitter.com/epigeneticwhisp/status/1212101702364434432?s=21

Healthy User Bias is 1 of the biggest probs in Vax ES. Already sick/vax-damaged kids r going 2 avoid another vax whereas healthier kids will..

29

Get the vax. There4 ES results would show kids who get the vax r healthier than their non-vax counterparts. See every1? Vax’s cause no problems!

The elephant in the room is that a multitude of ES”s show no vax harm which is indirect conflict w/BS showing the opposite..

30

When in doubt, remember that BS>ES. If a multitude of BS results r demonstrating vax harm & a multitude of ES results r in conflict w/this; we need 2 seriously start questioning the state of ES when it comes to vaccines. When u follow the $, see the revolving door clearly..

31

Pay attention 2 the whistleblowers, read the FOIA docs that were supposed 2 remain out of the public purview, & understand how large systems where lots of ppl benefit have a keen interest in maintaining the status quo then 1 can clearly see the sorry state of Vaccine Science.

32

The question that remains is.....

........Can you?

Beauty is truth's smile when she beholds her own face in a perfect mirror.

- Rabindranath Tagore

With love,

The Epigenetic Whisperer 🙏🙌

33

If you liked this tweet series, please like & share it with your own network. Also, please come join me, the Epigenetic Whisperer, on this journey to vibrant health by giving me a follow.

🙏🙌

Here’s the most thorough Vaccine Causes Autism thread ever produced on Twitter that links to 2 separate Uber Threads broken into Parts 1 & 2! Around 60 tweets total all threaded together!

https://twitter.com/epigeneticwhisp/status/1212101702364434432?s=21

Here is the most comprehensive tweet thread on Nutrients, Immunity & Vaccines ever produced on Twitter that links to 2 separate Uber Threads broken into Parts 1 & 2! Around 90 tweets total all threaded together!

https://twitter.com/epigeneticwhisp/status/1212475860894150656?s=21

Are our genes our destiny or r we in control of our health? What does the science say? How do pharmaceuticals/vaccines help or hurt us? What r gene SNPs? Is is true that our genes r the loaded gun & the environment pulls the trigger? Find out below.

https://twitter.com/epigeneticwhisp/status/1212605479194517504?s=21

Are Vax’s the only game in town wrt immunity? What about the gut-brain connection & whats it’s relation to immunity? Does all disease begin in the gut as Hippocrates started 2,000 yrs ago? Click below 2 find out; a threaded series of 50 tweets!

https://twitter.com/epigeneticwhisp/status/1212915994076663808?s=21

*Scientism

*Ronald Reagan NOT “millions from”! Darn iPad autocorrect!