data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75f2c/75f2c02481d310ba23f478ae30473fb269f3d7f6" alt=""
As the President and his team rightly point out, this latest attempt has roots from the very beginning of the administration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e4a7/5e4a733ed430a001bef00be42fb07c8fe53f87ee" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94a99/94a992f3b1516e6d62b46323900f3177cc91ba62" alt=""
Rather, it's a made-up offense to hang an impeachment hat on.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52786/52786166a0bba7c254c6223bbff5071da89190cf" alt=""
1. Transcripts show no wrongdoing.
2. Ukrainian officials confirm "no quid pro quo."
3. Firsthand witnesses corroborate "no quid pro quo" defense.
4. Security assistance was sent to Ukraine on time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a967b/a967b7865bacfd945f5084dbcfbf4acaf82c7b86" alt=""
In the 1st hearing, Adam Schiff's opening statement included a blatantly false retelling of the conversation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f064e/f064ed55fe4a89d1c2a787666a26f372b4e3fdc4" alt=""
No rights for POTUS either.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b22f/7b22f47c9f1301a47ddf1aa807a41cb642340724" alt=""
As we heard in one of the hearings, there were officials who disagreed w/ the Obama-era decision to withhold lethal military aid. Unlike President Trump, Obama was not impeached over this disagreement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59352/593525f44e6773ccdb01b262a7108f2da9593c1f" alt=""
Democrats charge President Trump with Obstruction of Congress for doing what most - if not all Presidents - have done in one way or another: asserting some kind of executive privilege.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6da0/d6da083c005aa37122825486ca6050215b361297" alt=""
Meanwhile, Schiff hasn't released the transcript from Intelligence Community IG Michael Atkinson's secret testimony.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ade00/ade0043ecebfafc9c4a8eade4d79a9622d32bc42" alt=""
If they felt strongly about their subpoenas, Democrats should have taken their cases to court.
Instead they actually withdrew one of their challenges!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e98d/9e98d54dbcfc92ec1cb4bb9c87bbab4475f78e84" alt=""
"The House may not usurp Executive Branch authority and may not bypass our Constitution's system of checks and balances. Asserting valid constitutional privileges and immunities cannot be an impeachable offense."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8770c/8770cdf658bb9ea43566a9e515c04b5073ac9f66" alt=""
But the Constitution gives the right to execute a foreign policy agenda to the POTUS alone - not diplomats!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b412/4b4120bec339ce837bb7065d44b3cc33e9f2f6c3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a056/2a056c75355e745873cd1b1447cbe965da85af5e" alt=""
This partisan, vindictive charade by House Democrats is THEIR abuse of power.
They shredded the President's due process rights. They had no evidence to make their case.