@jstreetdotorg @HatikvahSlate It should give people pause that J Street's version of advocating for a two-state solution (a reasonable aim!) includes advocating for a right of return (the elimination of Israel).
@jstreetdotorg @HatikvahSlate This isn't a stray pdf lying around on J Street's server. It's a document they actively promoted.
@jstreetdotorg @HatikvahSlate There's a pattern there. For example, J Street's caucus supported an anti-Israel letter in Congress that was praised by the terror group Hamas:
@jstreetdotorg @HatikvahSlate Here, the head of J Street pretends militants killed by Israel during a round of fighting were "civilians": blog.camera.org/archives/2012/…
@jstreetdotorg @HatikvahSlate Why would it mischaracterize members of terror orgs as "civilians" wrongly killed by Israel? Because—and this should be pretty uncontroversial—it's main goal is to increase pressure on Israel. Even as it advocates *easing* pressure on Hamas.
@jstreetdotorg @HatikvahSlate Here's another one from the vault:
@jstreetdotorg @HatikvahSlate So ask yourselves…
@jstreetdotorg @HatikvahSlate I'll leave it there. Those who support two states, and also support security for Israelis, and also believe it's important that US public opinion remain supportive of Israel, and who oppose "return" meant to eliminate the Jewish state, probably shouldn't vote J Street's slate.
@jstreetdotorg @HatikvahSlate *its its its its its
