, 9 tweets, 5 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Trump recorded by Fruman & Parnas, April 2018:
"Get rid of [Yovanovitch]! Get her out tomorrow. Take her out...Do it."
Not explicitly a threat. But Trump has official powers & channels. Why talk this way to these 2 thugs?
Always troubling. More now.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/recor…
Great catch by @carolynEast2 on why timing April 30, 2018:
Mueller & Manafort.
May 2, 2018: "In Ukraine, where officials are wary of offending Trump, [investigation] has been frozen by Ukraine’s chief prosecutor."
And an arms deal.
h/t @tzmaltesemama:
@CarolynEast2 @tzmaltesemama Timeline:
Feb 2018: Mueller got Gates in plea deal.
March: reports of Roger Stone direct link between Trump and WikiLeaks
April 9: SDNY raided Cohen.
Huge turning point in Trump investigation.
What if Ukraine helped Mueller?
Or if Ukraine could be bribed/extorted w/ arms?
@CarolynEast2 @tzmaltesemama 4/ If Trump had legitimate reasons to remove Yovanovitch in April, he could've used official channels. But there were no public officials in this meeting.
Afraid of Mueller, w/ guilty mindset & intent to cover-up/ obstruction, Trump had to find a "shadow" (criminal) channel.
@CarolynEast2 @tzmaltesemama 5/ I'm not saying Trump intended "Take her out" as a hint at violence. But there seems to be proof of criminal stalking/hacking/intimidation campaign by Hyde etc.

This is why high crimes don't have to be felonies. When a president abuses his power...
...with a shadow foreign policy & shadowier criminals, & a lot of power & money & risk on the line, with the "boss" giving a lot of hints to avoid explicitly getting caught planning crimes...
really bad things can happen.
6/ it’s hard to know, but hard to imagine what Trump was asking them to do wasn’t hinting at something criminal. Not clearly violent, but something so shadow unofficial that his words would lead to crossed lines.

***And again, how can we know unless Senate calls witnesses***
7/ Update: Crucial context.
I hadn't seen that WH official DeStefano was in this conversation. It does point to an alternative reading of an official channel, though too blustery & risky.
I'd seen earlier reporting that there were no fed officials around.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Jed Shugerman

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!