My Authors
Read all threads
1/ I want to very briefly address this article that came out today by @matthewcobb in the Guardian:

theguardian.com/science/2020/f…
2/ I'm tempted to ignore it, but I think that would actually be a shame, because in many ways, it's a good article. Yet, it is also a confused article, and I worry about it confusing both scientists and the public more broadly. So, I'll just quickly address the confusion.
3/ The mistake is a classic mistake. @matthewcobb is not the first to make it, and I know he will not be the last. It's this: to think that Von Neumann machines (like our laptops) are the only type of computer, and that their properties define computation. That is false.
4/ If you study neurophysiology, it becomes very clear that our brains are nothing like our laptops, desktops or smart phones. They don't work the same way, period. @matthewcobb's article describes all this well enough, and on this he's dead right.
5/ But there can be many other types of computer. A computer is just a device that can compute many different computable functions. Our brain is one such device, so brains are literally computers. I've covered this previously:

medium.com/the-spike/yes-…
6/ You can tell when someone is confused about this right away when they talk about the "brain as computer metaphor", or start making reference to hydraulic pumps and older theories of the brain based on earlier SoTA tech to argue that we're making the same mistake now.
7/ What this tells you is that the writer/speaker thinks computers are equivalent to Von Neumann machines. So, on some level they're right, since brains aren't like Von Neumann machines.
8/ But, honestly, I don't know any neuroscientists who think the brain works like a laptop. As such, this is a straw-man. There may still be some people in other disciplines who think brains function like Von Neumann machines, but I suspect they are an ever shrinking demographic.
9/ So, to @matthewcobb or any other person who reads his article: take the good stuff, which is the discussions of all the ways in which understanding the brain is difficult and not helped by pat analogy to the sort of computers we use to do our office work on a daily basis.
10/ But, realise that the terminology is being abused here, and brains *are* computers, just a very different kind than our laptops. Neuroscientists are trying to understand how brains compute, and we all know it's not like our laptops, so you don't have to point that out to us.
Fin/ Neuroscience has a long way to go, but we're not so deeply off-track as this article implies. We know full well that brains don't operate like the device I'm typing these messages on right now. Please don't make our discipline seem more wrong-headed than it is.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Blake Richards

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!