The Epoch Times is not a reliable source but this data looks legitimate for these reasons:
THREAD:
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ER3yhOfUEAAeBgW.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ER3yhOfUcAE4h_r.jpg)
The Epoch Times isn't always a reliable outlet - I doubt they would fully fabricate a document but it wouldn't be hard to dupe them into publishing something fake. 3/
5/
the detail;
that it is a working document;
that it reflects officially acknowledged data.
6/
scmp.com/news/china/soc…
10/
Testing this email address on online tools shows through 3 different tools that it is a real and valid email address. 12/
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ER31m_FU0AUyBlO.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ER31m_wUEAEx5Ec.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ER31nAUUUAg9n10.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ER31nA-UYAAF4LX.jpg)
The website's manual probably has more info: web.archive.org/web/2019071514… 13/
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ER310cTUEAABEjS.jpg)
) 15/
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ER32SBLU4AADTgH.png)
Try this: epochtimes.com/b5/20/2/24/n11…
It was also published 2 days ago not today! I'm just clearly not as on top of Epoch Times reporting as I could be😝