The bigger issue was interconnected ness of the financial system
Since then a lot of rules have changed and many countries have reacted differently
Mandatory clearing (through CME, LCH, ICE or other clearing houses) and better margining has lead to less counterparty risk.
Banks also are better capitalised
A decade of easy money has seen a lot of US corporates issuing debt to buyback shares, which has left the firm a lot more leveraged, though boosted CEO income through stock options being worth more.
Small City States like Singapore use debt only for investment, and have stronger balance sheets
Good - stable central govt debt to gdp, higher FX reserves by RBI, established Bankruptcy code, reduced subsidy on fuel
Bad - rising entitlement spending of government pensions and salaries and MNREGA schemes
- Public Sector Banks have large NPAs
- NBFC sector grew too fast, and ILFS default, Yes bank bail-in
- Zombie PSU like MTNL, BSNL, Air India are drain on country for few entitled employees. Cheaper to shut them down?
This is another inflection point for geopolitics and society and behavioural patterns
- Who has room to spend more?
- who has state capacity of executing difficult task of controlling the spread
- who invested in medical infra
- which society has trust and puts group above self
Strong government and good state capacity - E.g. singapore (you could lose you employment visa by disobeying quarantine rules)
Fiscal room - Germany ...
That would hurt the stoppage of spread of the virus.
We need group cohesion to come together and work together.
Both countries are deeply divided in ideological lines
Lot of impacts will be on regulations, impacts globalisation, etc
Who comes out stronger?
The ones who built resilient systems in the good years in between.
While I want India to do well (could be an alternative manufacturing destination to China - its not a done deal)
- Italy aging demographics, high level of debt (fiscal stimulus), many changing governments
- iran - oil shock, large cases out of control