So let me be clear that I was against this useless and cruel 21 days lockdown from the very first day.
Nothing about the pandemic was going to change substantially in 21 days other than buying us time. 1/n
1. Do you have a better/Is there any other solution if not lockdown?
2. Isn't the delay helpful to the government to ramp up state capacity to deal with the crisis?
We will try and answer both questions. 5/n
The issue such line of questioning is the implicit assumption that lockdown is a solution without probing
a. Whether is it actually a soln?
b. If yes, under what conditions?
c. Are those conditions possible? 6/n
Yes, says WHO. Provided
1. We are able to enforce proper social distancing and
2. We are able to test, isolate, trace and treat each of the potential patient. 7/n.
Absolutely not. It is just 6 days into lockdown, apart from migrants exodus, you yourself can see the relaxed enforcement in the neighbourhood already. But yes it definitely reduces contacts. 8/n
But then it does delay the spread & gives the govt some time to build up the state capacity?
So isn't that sufficient enough to do the lockdown? 10/n
But in our country, every day of lockdown drains people, economically, physically and psychologically. A severe erosion in public resilience. 11/n
But what it does not see is that this delay is being bought at a tremendous cost. I am not saying anything about economy, supply chain disruption etc. Just the cost to individual. 12/n
And my answer is a resounding no.
State is already exhausted on the 6th day of lockdown.13/n
So no. Lockdown is not a soln at all. Rather it adds to the problem by imposing tremendous cost to society in general & poor in particular.
And alternative to something that adds to the problem is simply to not do that thing.