Question: Just to be clear, what is the projected death toll, should the people be reasonably good at following these mitigation measures? ...
PRESIDENT's Answer: Well, if they’re reasonably good, I guess we could say that — I’d like to have maybe Dr. Fauci or Deb come up and say. I mean, I have numbers but I’d rather have them say the numbers, if you don’t mind. It’s a big — it’s a big question. ...
What it means: @realDonaldTrump has numbers but he would rather have Fauci or Birx give you their answer, and basically own their data so that once Abbot Labs quick tests that decentralize data away from the Liberals at CDC & NIH and put control back to the doctor & patient, ...
they will have to explain why the tests are yielding different data sets that produce models that are far less doom & gloom than the data sets produced by Fauci & Birx. Add the effective treatment of hydroxychloroquin to the equation, and you'll have much lower death rates. ...
Sweden's "business as usual" decision poses a threat to "scientists" w/o posing a threat to Trump bc if their decision is good, Trump's "get back to work asap" narrative will prove insightful, if their decision is negative, Trump's "trust the scientists" will also prove correct.
