1/ Charap's reasoning is most realist & reasonable of other proposals coming from Washington these days on how to contain & deter #Russia over #Ukraine. Perhaps,RU does seek to change status-quo but this,as many in #Moscow see it,exactly what #US has sought to do in last 6+ years
2/ In any case, what @scharap proposes seems to be the best option in the given situation - avoiding a major war should be the focus. Containing RUS is much needed from #US standpoint, but this policy too has its own limits & #Putin made it clear the limit been reached.
3/ Military & political support to #Kiev emboldens #Ukraines authorities to act in #Saakashvili's style recklesness. Top it off w/ the silly resolution in #US Congress to thwart #Putin's presidency & look at it from #Kremlin's lens - how should it read US policy toward #Russia?
4/ Whether what Sam Charap proposes will be listened to @WhiteHouse or will other, more bellicose voices dominate the situation room at a critical moment? Modern #US history suggests Americans like steppingon the same rake atleast as often as Russians do..
5/ ...if that's the case now - too bad. @POTUS, however, despite all the criticism shown he's willing to correct mistakes of past aministrations, incl. @BarackObama, & take reputation blows over it. #Biden can't care less about either #Ukraine or #Russia & that's okay. But...
6/ ..he seems to care about #US standing in the world in the wake of confrontation w/ #China. A major war in #Ukraine would keep US attention & ressources in Europe for a long while, Russia will emerge as a bigger & more systemic problem.
7/ Getting bogged down in yet another crisis because of another semi-failed state (that is #Ukraine of today) won't turn #US to 'the best practices of the past' that its elites want,rather to a crisis from which it will be difficult to get out into the "bright future".
8/ In anticipation of trolls & criticism to flood this thread - my bottom line: #Ukraine needs to take Minsk agreements seriously. #Russia needs to weigh in possible risks seriously. #US needs to take Russia's security concerns seriously & tame #Kiev's gamble.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I read the title & thought #US was just playing fool.Then I watched @CNN asking abt "#Putin's motives for invading #Ukraine" & heard the answers such as "further dispution of #NATO" & "..constantly testing the West".
I know see why the "blind spot" edition.cnn.com/2021/11/15/pol…
Seriously thou, there're some Russia experts in #Washington who read #Russia well. There're not many but enought to draw on their expetise to make accurate policies. The intel "blind spot" isn't cuz of lack of info or access to #Putin's closed circle...
..It's abt political will to correct the course of action,resists lobbysts & political inertia.
There was no lack of intel on #Afghanistan - thou assessments divereged.There's no lack of intel on RUS,either understanding of why Putin may be inclined to use force...
The problem is not that #Putin directs #Lukashenka's actions - he does not. The problem is that #Belarus for #Russia is transforming into what #DPRK is for #China. But this is Russia's problem, not #EU's.
The problem for #EU is it has long outsourced decision-making on key issues in regions of strategic importance for Europe to #US (which,in turn,falls prey to US domestic politics).
EU won't recognise it. Instead,it keeps looking for "#Putin factor" in every new challenge it faces
The lesson for others to learn is that turning states into failed entities has long term consequences. Lukashenka weaponizing migrants-wrong.
Europeans refusing to face consequences of their own policies (Libya, Afghanistan, Syria) - the migrants ARE exactly that - irresponsible.
This year #Russia's flagship conference - annual meeting of the @valdaitweets in #Sochi - features Foreign Minister Lavrov,#Moscow's mayor Sobyanin,former #Afghanistan president Karzai &,possibly,#Putin himself.The place is amazing & the venue is intellectually rich. Stay tuned.
Day 2 at @valdaitweets conference. @mfa_russia Sergey Lavrov speaks.
Kicks off by detailing #Russia's position on ceasing contacts with @NATO, argues the problems been piling up, #NATO was long sabotaging & rejecting many of #Moscow initiatives
#Russia published its annual Foreign Policy Review, a 66 page document that highlights key events and issues in RUS foreign policy and diplomatic activity in 2020. Full text here (in RUS): mid.ru/ru/activity/re…
A brief summary of relations w/ #US in this SHORT THREAD
1. Relations w/ #US & #Canada discussed on 1.5 pages. The FP review says "tensions w/ US continued to build up becuase of multifaceted American efforts to contain #Russia. Interaction was limited and ad hoc."
2. In 2020, Presidents (#Putin & #Trump) spoke on the phone 8 times, Foreign ministers spoke on the phone 6 times + 1 meeting @MunSecConf. Security Councils of #US & #Russia "maintained contacts". In April, Russia sent "humanitarian medical aid" to US, US sent to RUS ventilators.
⚡Putin responded to @POTUS remarks over #Russia/n president being a "killer" & #Moscow's meddling in #US election by saying he "wishes him good health"
#Putin added: "In childhood we were playing in the yard, and when we argued with each other, we used to say: "Whoever calls his name is called that." And this is no coincidence, this is not just a childish saying and joke. The meaning is very deep in this, psychological.”
Kudos to @KatieChe_ for the updates and the translation, she's been on top on this story
#Russia, #US,and the fight over #SputnikV
Short THREAD #Putin made interesting comments that are important to understand how #Russia reads the situation with promotion of #vaccines
1. #Putin: "Global market for #COVID19 vaccines is worth $100 billion. We see how competitors of our producers behave: they enter a country [that is in need for vaccines],sell a small batch of vaccines on a discounted price but condition the sale with that...
2. "...the country will only purchase that vaccine from that producer in the future. So, there’s a real fight for the markets".