#PrivacyDay2022
The Right to Privacy was recognised as a Fundamental Right guaranteed under our Constitution on this day, five years ago by the Supreme Court of India when it delivered the landmark judgment - 'Retd. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India'
The Honorable Supreme Court of India held the #RightToPrivacy to be an essential part of liberty protected under Article 21, and freedom of speech and expression under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution.
The court observed that #Privacy cannot be encroached upon by the state in an arbitrary manner and has to withstand the test of permissible restriction on fundamental rights. The court also observed the debate regarding the trade-off b/w security and privacy.
Even after 5 yrs of the SC directing the Government to bring in place a law protecting & regulating informational privacy, no law has been enacted.
In August 2022, the government withdrew the #PersonalDataProtectionBill after it was under deliberation for 4 yrs
The bill was a culmination of the BN Sri Krishna Committee Report of 2018 and was laid before the Parliament on 11 December 2019. It was referred to the JPC on the same day and the report of this committee was presented before the Parliament in December 2021
While there exists no tangible legal framework to protect the #Privacy of individuals, the police have time and again conducted arbitrary and indiscriminate search and seizure of mobile electronic devices.
Such an invasion of #privacy by state has become a concerning issue and has affected journalists, academics and activists and ordinary citizens. Recently, a petition was filed before the SC by a group of Academics to lay down guidelines on search and seizure.
The Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021 passed on December 29 2021 provides for linking of Aadhaar Cards with voter IDs. With this, all the information contained in the Aadhaar including biometric information could be linked to the voter ID as well.
On June 17 2022, the Government laid down the Registration of Electors (Amendment) Rules, 2022 which prescribe the procedure for the linking. Although its not mandatory, it's still beyond the scope limited by the SC in the Puttaswamy II judgment.
On April 28, 2022, @IndianCERT issued directions for various stakeholders that require VPNs to register information regarding names of subscribers, IPs, email and purpose for hiring services etc., for a period of 5 years.
The direction seeks to gather and store user data and is a restriction on right to privacy.However, the directions fail the proportionality test of #RightToPrivacy
The Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022 was passed by the Parliament on April 18, 2022. The Act contains several concerning provisions that prima facie fall foul of the fundamental rights enshrined in Part-III of the Constitution of India.
Section 3 of the Act gives police wide powers to take the measurements of any person convicted of or arrested in connection with, an offence under the law. This violates the #RightToPrivacy held to be inherent under Article 21, as held in #Puttaswamy.
We at @SFLCin have been working to safeguard the #Privacy of Indian citizens, since 2010.
To help us continue fighting for your digital freedom, support us by making a donation at sflc.in/donate
The petition is yet to come up.
We will be sharing more details regarding the petition once it is listed.
We are committed to defend your digital freedoms and to #LetTheNetWork. #StayTuned
#Updates on @videolan being inaccessible on ISP platforms.
As per the last #RTI response, @GoI_MeitY
had said, “No information is available with this ministry related to videolan.org website”.
We have filed a second appeal for it & are awaiting a response. #Censorship
Latest tests on various carriers show different messages being displayed every time we try to load the "videolan.org" website. @ACTFibernet states that "The website has been blocked as per order of Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology under IT Act, 2000."
The collection and processing of sensitive personal data such as biometric & biological samples for the purposes of identification do not, satisfy the test of proportionality.
The absence of any opportunity of hearing for persons refusing to allow their measurements to be taken highlights the failure to meet the State’s aim for promoting justice, as provided under Article 39A of the Constitution.
The RTI response states that the law under which the suspension was ordered is Order Number F 35(1) Home-9/ 2006 Pt. Dated 02-09-2017 issued by Home (Gr.9) Department of Rajasthan Government.
The order states that in exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 2(1) of the Temporary Suspension Of Telecom Services Rules, 2017, the DCs of the State of Rajasthan are hereby empowered to exercise the powers conferred by the Rules in case of public emergency or public safety.